Core i3-330M
VS
Core 2 Duo E6750

Core i3-330M vs Core 2 Duo E6750

Intel

Core i3-330M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 0.13 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E6750

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-330M is positioned at rank 276 and the Core 2 Duo E6750 is on rank 1069, so the Core i3-330M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-330M

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
97%
#264
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
426%
#265
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
420%
#266
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
386%
#267
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
384%
#268
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
380%
#270
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
367%
#271
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
352%
#272
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
352%
#273
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
342%
#276
Core i3-330M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6750

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
55465%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
52409%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
38053%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
11464%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
9081%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
7944%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
4550%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
4490%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
4089%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
4088%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
4043%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3933%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3878%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3863%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3828%
#1069
Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP: $183|Avg: $15
100%
#1070
Athlon II X4 635
MSRP: $400|Avg: $250
100%
#1071
Core i7-940
MSRP: $562|Avg: $90
96%
#1072
Celeron 2.40
MSRP: $69|Avg: $13
89%
#1073
Sempron 2800+
MSRP: $65|Avg: $29
88%
#1074
Athlon 64 3100+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
85%
#1075
Sempron 3600+
MSRP: $105|Avg: $20
82%
#1076
Celeron 2.80
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
76%
#1077
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
MSRP: $450|Avg: $20
72%
#1078
Athlon 64 3600+
MSRP: $149|Avg: $15
71%
#1079
Core 2 Quad Q6700
MSRP: $530|Avg: $50
70%
#1080
Athlon 64 2600+
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
70%
#1081
Celeron 2.20
MSRP: $79|Avg: $15
69%
#1082
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
MSRP: $420|Avg: $15
64%
#1083
Athlon 64 X2 4000+
MSRP: $328|Avg: $10
64%
#1084
Core i7-975
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo E6750 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-330M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-330MCore 2 Duo E6750
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-330MCore 2 Duo E6750
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-330M and Core 2 Duo E6750

Intel

Core i3-330M

The Core i3-330M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $49.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6750

The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i3-330M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo E6750's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Core i3-330M versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — a 181.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 2.13 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core i3-330M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-330M scores 1,032 against the Core 2 Duo E6750's 1,029 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-330M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-330M vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6750.

FeatureCore i3-330MCore 2 Duo E6750
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
0.13 GHz
2.67 GHz+1954%
Base Clock
2.13 GHz
2.66 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4 MB+1500%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,032
1,029
Geekbench 6 Single
317
Geekbench 6 Multi
689
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-330M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core i3-330M versus 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — the Core 2 Duo E6750 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6750 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55,PM55,QM57 (Core i3-330M) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750).

FeatureCore i3-330MCore 2 Duo E6750
Socket
PGA988
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
1333+44333%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+52428700%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / EPT (Core i3-330M) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6750). The Core i3-330M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale)), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-330M targets Legacy Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-330M rivals AMD Athlon II P320; Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.

FeatureCore i3-330MCore 2 Duo E6750
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale)
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x / EPT
true
Target Use
Legacy Budget