Core i3-330M vs V-Series V105

Core i3-330M vs V-Series V105 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-330M

2 / 4

1,032

+0.4%

1,028

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-330M vs V-Series V105 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-330M vs V-Series V105: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-330M

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale), while V-Series V105 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

V-Series V105

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,028 vs 1,032).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-330M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-330M better than V-Series V105?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, V-Series V105 is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330M pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-330M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-330M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-330M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i3-330M vs V-Series V105 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-330M

The Core i3-330M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $49.

V-Series V105

The V-Series V105 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-330M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the V-Series V105 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Core i3-330M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 0.13 GHz on the Core i3-330M versus 1.2 GHz on the V-Series V105 — a 160.9% clock advantage for the V-Series V105. The Core i3-330M is built on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i3-330M scores 1,032 against the V-Series V105's 1,028 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-330M.

Feature	Core i3-330M	V-Series V105
Cores / Threads	2 / 4+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	0.13 GHz	1.2 GHz+823%
Base Clock	2.13 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	—
PassMark	1,032	1,028
Geekbench 6 Single	317	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	689	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-330M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the V-Series V105 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-330M	V-Series V105
Socket	PGA988	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / EPT (Core i3-330M) / not specified (V-Series V105). The Core i3-330M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale)), while the V-Series V105 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-330M targets Legacy Budget. Direct competitor: Core i3-330M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.