Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Core i3-330M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Core i3-330M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Core i3-330M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Duo E6750

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i3-330M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,029 vs 1,032).
❌Launch MSRP is still $183 MSRP, while Core i3-330M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-330M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-330M

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale), while Core 2 Duo E6750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6750.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E6750 better than Core i3-330M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E6750 is ahead with a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330M pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-330M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo E6750 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo E6750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $183 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-330M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.3% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-330M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Core i3-330M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 2 Duo E6750

The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.

Core i3-330M

The Core i3-330M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $49.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core 2 Duo E6750 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-330M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 versus 0.13 GHz on the Core i3-330M — a 181.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E6750 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i3-330M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6750 scores 1,029 against the Core i3-330M's 1,032 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-330M. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6750 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-330M.

Feature	Core 2 Duo E6750	Core i3-330M
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.67 GHz+1954%	0.13 GHz
Base Clock	2.66 GHz+25%	2.13 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	65 nm	32 nm-51%
Architecture	Conroe (2006−2007)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,029	1,032
Geekbench 6 Single	—	317
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	689

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Duo E6750 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-330M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i3-330M — the Core 2 Duo E6750 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6750 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750) and HM55,PM55,QM57 (Core i3-330M).

Feature	Core 2 Duo E6750	Core i3-330M
Socket	LGA775	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	1333+25%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core 2 Duo E6750) vs VT-x / EPT (Core i3-330M). The Core i3-330M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale)), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-330M targets Legacy Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450; Core i3-330M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.