Celeron G440 vs Core 2 Duo E6750

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G440 vs Core 2 Duo E6750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G440 vs Core 2 Duo E6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G440

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $146 less on MSRP ($37 MSRP vs $183 MSRP).
✅Delivers 397.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($37 MSRP vs $183 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Core 2 Duo E6750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6750.

Core 2 Duo E6750

2007

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron G440.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,029 vs 1,035).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 28.0 PassMark/$ ($183 MSRP vs $37 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G440 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G440 better than Core 2 Duo E6750?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E6750 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G440 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G440 is the better buy right now. Celeron G440 comes in $146 cheaper on MSRP at $37 MSRP versus $183 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo E6750 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 397.5% better value on MSRP (28.0 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G440 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G440 vs Core 2 Duo E6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G440

The Celeron G440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $45.

Core 2 Duo E6750

The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G440 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core 2 Duo E6750 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron G440 versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — a 50.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron G440 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G440 scores 1,035 against the Core 2 Duo E6750's 1,029 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron G440. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron G440 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6750.

Feature	Celeron G440	Core 2 Duo E6750
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.67 GHz+67%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.66 GHz+66%
L3 Cache	1 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	4 MB+1500%
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,035	1,029
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G440 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G440 versus 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — the Core 2 Duo E6750 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G440 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G440) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750).

Feature	Celeron G440	Core 2 Duo E6750
Socket	LGA1155	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	1333+25%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron G440) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6750). The Celeron G440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G440 rivals Pentium G630; Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.

Feature	Celeron G440	Core 2 Duo E6750
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G440 was priced at $37, while the Core 2 Duo E6750 came in at $183. On launch pricing ($37 vs $183), Celeron G440 was $146 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G440 delivers 28.0 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E6750 — making the Celeron G440 the 133.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G440	Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP	$37-80%	$183
Performance per Dollar	28.0+400%	5.6
Release Date	2011	2007

Search Celeron G440 on Amazon

Search Core 2 Duo E6750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.