Celeron 1037U
VS
Celeron G440

Celeron 1037U vs Celeron G440

Intel

Celeron 1037U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron G440

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1037U is positioned at rank 275 and the Celeron G440 is on rank 625, so the Celeron 1037U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1037U

#263
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
426%
#264
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
419%
#265
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
385%
#266
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
383%
#267
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
380%
#269
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
367%
#270
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
352%
#271
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
351%
#272
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
342%
#275
Celeron 1037U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G440

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11145%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10531%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7646%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2303%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1825%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1596%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
914%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
902%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
822%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
821%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
812%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
790%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
779%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
776%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
769%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
99%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
98%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
100%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
99%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
100%
#628
A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
99%
#629
Core i3-8350K
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#630
Core i3-6320
MSRP: $160|Avg: $35
99%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
98%
#634
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
98%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
98%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
98%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
97%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
97%
#640
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron 1037U leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G440 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 1037UCeleron G440
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 1037UCeleron G440
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1037U and Celeron G440

Intel

Celeron 1037U

The Celeron 1037U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,034 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Celeron G440

The Celeron G440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $45.

Processing Power

The Celeron 1037U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G440 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 1037U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 1037U versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron G440 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Celeron 1037U (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron 1037U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G440 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1037U scores 1,034 against the Celeron G440's 1,035 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron G440. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 324 vs 300, a 7.7% lead for the Celeron 1037U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1037U vs 1 MB on the Celeron G440.

FeatureCeleron 1037UCeleron G440
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz+12%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz+12%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)+100%
1 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,034
1,035
Geekbench 6 Single
324+8%
300
Geekbench 6 Multi
626
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1037U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G440 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM70,NM70,HM76 (Celeron 1037U) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G440).

FeatureCeleron 1037UCeleron G440
Socket
BGA1023
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Celeron 1037U) vs VT-x (Celeron G440). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1037U) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G440) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1037U targets Budget Mobile, Celeron G440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 1037U rivals AMD E1-2500; Celeron G440 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureCeleron 1037UCeleron G440
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
VT-x
Target Use
Budget Mobile
Budget