Celeron 1037U vs Celeron J1850

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1037U vs Celeron J1850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1037U vs Celeron J1850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1037U

2013

Why buy it

✅+80% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Celeron J1850

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (180 vs 324).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (450 vs 626).
❌Launch MSRP is still $82 MSRP, while Celeron 1037U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron 1037U better than Celeron J1850?

Yes. Celeron 1037U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data and 39.1% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron 1037U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 39 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 1037U is the stronger fit. You are getting 39.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron 1037U is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron 1037U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $82 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 39 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron J1850 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J1850 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Celeron 1037U vs Celeron J1850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1037U

The Celeron 1037U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,034 points. Launch price was $86.

Celeron J1850

The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1037U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J1850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J1850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 1037U versus 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Celeron J1850 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron 1037U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron J1850 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1037U scores 1,034 against the Celeron J1850's 1,035 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron J1850. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 324 vs 180, a 57.1% lead for the Celeron 1037U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 626 vs 450 (32.7% advantage for the Celeron 1037U). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1037U vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850.

Feature	Celeron 1037U	Celeron J1850
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2 GHz+11%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark	1,034	1,035
Geekbench 6 Single	324+80%	180
Geekbench 6 Multi	626+39%	450

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1037U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J1850 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Celeron 1037U versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1850 — the Celeron 1037U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 1037U supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 1037U) vs 4 (Celeron J1850) — the Celeron 1037U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM70,NM70,HM76 (Celeron 1037U) and N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1850).

Feature	Celeron 1037U	Celeron J1850
Socket	BGA1023	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600+20%	DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Celeron 1037U) vs VT-x (Celeron J1850). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron 1037U) and HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron J1850) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1037U targets Budget Mobile, Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron 1037U rivals AMD E1-2500; Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900.

Feature	Celeron 1037U	Celeron J1850
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)	HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, EPT	VT-x
Target Use	Budget Mobile	Low Power