Celeron 1037U vs Pentium N3510

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 1037U vs Pentium N3510 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 1037U vs Pentium N3510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 1037U

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), while Pentium N3510 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,034 vs 1,040).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Pentium N3510

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while Celeron 1037U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 1037U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3510 better than Celeron 1037U?

Yes. Pentium N3510 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium N3510 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N3510 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3510 is the better buy right now. Pentium N3510 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $161 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3510 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 1037U vs Pentium N3510 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 1037U

The Celeron 1037U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,034 points. Launch price was $86.

Pentium N3510

The Pentium N3510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,040 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 1037U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Pentium N3510 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3510 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 1037U versus 2 GHz on the Pentium N3510 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Pentium N3510 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron 1037U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium N3510 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1037U scores 1,034 against the Pentium N3510's 1,040 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium N3510. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1037U vs 2 MB on the Pentium N3510.

Feature	Celeron 1037U	Pentium N3510
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2 GHz+11%
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	2 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	2 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,034	1,040
Geekbench 6 Single	324	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	626	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1037U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium N3510 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 1037U	Pentium N3510
Socket	BGA1023	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Celeron 1037U) / not specified (Pentium N3510). The Celeron 1037U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium N3510 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1037U targets Budget Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 1037U rivals AMD E1-2500.