Celeron 1037U
VS
Pentium E6300

Celeron 1037U vs Pentium E6300

Intel

Celeron 1037U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Pentium E6300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 1037U is positioned at rank 275 and the Pentium E6300 is on rank 958, so the Celeron 1037U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 1037U

#263
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
426%
#264
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
419%
#265
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
385%
#266
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
383%
#267
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
380%
#269
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
367%
#270
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
352%
#271
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
351%
#272
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
342%
#275
Celeron 1037U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#277
Core 2 Extreme X9100
MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E6300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
25363%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
23966%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
17401%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5242%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4152%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3633%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2081%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2053%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1870%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1869%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1849%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1799%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1774%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1766%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1750%
#958
Pentium E6300
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
100%
#959
Core i5-661
MSRP: $196|Avg: $40
99%
#960
Core i3-4150
MSRP: $281|Avg: $70
99%
#961
Core i5-750
MSRP: $210|Avg: $30
99%
#962
Core i3-2100T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $127
98%
#963
Pentium E2210
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
97%
#964
Core i3-560
MSRP: $138|Avg: $10
97%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
96%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
96%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
96%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
95%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
95%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
95%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
94%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium E6300 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 1037U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 1037UPentium E6300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron 1037UPentium E6300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 1037U and Pentium E6300

Intel

Celeron 1037U

The Celeron 1037U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,034 points. Launch price was $86.

Intel

Pentium E6300

The Pentium E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $40.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 1037U and Pentium E6300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 1037U versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E6300 — a 43.5% clock advantage for the Pentium E6300 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron 1037U uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium E6300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 1037U scores 1,034 against the Pentium E6300's 1,032 — a 0.2% lead for the Celeron 1037U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 1037U vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6300.

FeatureCeleron 1037UPentium E6300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz+56%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.8 GHz+56%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (total)+700%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,034
1,032
Geekbench 6 Single
324
Geekbench 6 Multi
626
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 1037U uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E6300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 1037UPentium E6300
Socket
BGA1023
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Celeron 1037U) / not specified (Pentium E6300). The Celeron 1037U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)), while the Pentium E6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 1037U targets Budget Mobile. Direct competitor: Celeron 1037U rivals AMD E1-2500.

FeatureCeleron 1037UPentium E6300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
Target Use
Budget Mobile
Celeron 1037U vs Pentium E6300