Celeron G440 vs Pentium 3558U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G440 vs Pentium 3558U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G440 vs Pentium 3558U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G440

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium 3558U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,035 vs 1,041).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $37 MSRP, while Pentium 3558U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium 3558U

2014

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G440 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 3558U better than Celeron G440?

Yes. Pentium 3558U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium 3558U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 3558U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 3558U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium 3558U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $37 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G440 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (28.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 3558U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011), 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G440 vs Pentium 3558U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G440

The Celeron G440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $45.

Pentium 3558U

The Pentium 3558U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,041 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G440 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium 3558U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium 3558U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron G440 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium 3558U — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Pentium 3558U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron G440 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium 3558U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G440 scores 1,035 against the Pentium 3558U's 1,041 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium 3558U. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron G440 vs 2 MB on the Pentium 3558U.

Feature	Celeron G440	Pentium 3558U
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.7 GHz+6%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	1.7 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB	512 kB+100%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,035	1,041
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G440 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 3558U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G440	Pentium 3558U
Socket	LGA1155	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G440) / not specified (Pentium 3558U). The Celeron G440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium 3558U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G440 rivals Pentium G630.