Celeron G440 vs Pentium E6300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G440 vs Pentium E6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G440 vs Pentium E6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G440

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $47 less on MSRP ($37 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
✅Delivers 127.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($37 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Pentium E6300

2009

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,032 vs 1,035).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 28.0 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $37 MSRP).
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G440 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G440 better than Pentium E6300?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium E6300 is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G440 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G440 is the better buy right now. Celeron G440 comes in $47 cheaper on MSRP at $37 MSRP versus $84 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Pentium E6300 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 127.7% better value on MSRP (28.0 vs 12.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G440 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G440 vs Pentium E6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G440

The Celeron G440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $45.

Pentium E6300

The Pentium E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $40.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G440 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium E6300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pentium E6300 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron G440 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E6300 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Pentium E6300 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron G440 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E6300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G440 scores 1,035 against the Pentium E6300's 1,032 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G440. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron G440 vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6300.

Feature	Celeron G440	Pentium E6300
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.8 GHz+75%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.8 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	1 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	2 MB (total)+700%
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,035	1,032
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G440 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G440	Pentium E6300
Socket	LGA1155	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G440) / not specified (Pentium E6300). The Celeron G440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium E6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G440 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Celeron G440	Pentium E6300
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G440 was priced at $37, while the Pentium E6300 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($37 vs $84), Celeron G440 was $47 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G440 delivers 28.0 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Pentium E6300 — making the Celeron G440 the 77.9% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G440	Pentium E6300
MSRP	$37-56%	$84
Performance per Dollar	28.0+128%	12.3
Release Date	2011	2009

Search Celeron G440 on Amazon

Search Pentium E6300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.