PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G440 vs Pentium N3510 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G440 vs Pentium N3510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G440

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $124 less on MSRP ($37 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅Delivers 333.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($37 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Pentium N3510 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,035 vs 1,040).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
❌1650% higher power demand at 35W vs 2W.

Pentium N3510

2013

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Draws 2W instead of 35W, a 33W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 28.0 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $37 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G440 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3510 better than Celeron G440?

Yes. Pentium N3510 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium N3510 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N3510 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3510 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pentium N3510 comes in 335.1% more expensive on MSRP at $161 MSRP versus $37 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G440 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 333.0% better value on paper (28.0 vs 6.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3510 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2011), 100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G440 vs Pentium N3510 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G440

The Celeron G440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $45.

Pentium N3510

The Pentium N3510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,040 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G440 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Pentium N3510 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Pentium N3510 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron G440 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium N3510 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Pentium N3510 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron G440 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium N3510 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G440 scores 1,035 against the Pentium N3510's 1,040 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium N3510. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron G440 vs 2 MB on the Pentium N3510.

Feature	Celeron G440	Pentium N3510
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	4 / 4+300%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
L2 Cache	256 kB	2 MB+700%
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,035	1,040
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G440 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium N3510 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G440	Pentium N3510
Socket	LGA1155	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G440) / not specified (Pentium N3510). The Celeron G440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Pentium N3510 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G440 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Celeron G440	Pentium N3510
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G440 was priced at $37, while the Pentium N3510 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($37 vs $161), Celeron G440 was $124 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G440 delivers 28.0 pts/$ vs 6.5 pts/$ for the Pentium N3510 — making the Celeron G440 the 125% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G440	Pentium N3510
MSRP	$37-77%	$161
Performance per Dollar	28.0+331%	6.5
Release Date	2011	2013

Search Celeron G440 on Amazon

Search Pentium N3510 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.