Celeron G440 vs E-350

Celeron G440 vs E-350 Performance Spectrum

Celeron G440

1 / 1

1,035

0.0%

1,049

+1.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G440 vs E-350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G440 vs E-350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G440

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $13 less on MSRP ($37 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅Delivers 33.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($37 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while E-350 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,035 vs 1,049).
❌94.4% higher power demand at 35W vs 18W.

E-350

2011

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 18W instead of 35W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 28.0 PassMark/$ ($50 MSRP vs $37 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G440 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is E-350 better than Celeron G440?

Yes. E-350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, E-350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

E-350 is still the much better call for a fresh build. E-350 comes in 35.1% more expensive on MSRP at $50 MSRP versus $37 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G440 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 33.3% better value on paper (28.0 vs 21.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

E-350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G440 vs E-350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G440

The Celeron G440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $45.

E-350

The E-350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,049 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G440 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the E-350 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the E-350 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron G440 versus 1.6 GHz on the E-350 — identical boost frequencies. The Celeron G440 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the E-350 uses Zacate (2011−2013) (40 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G440 scores 1,035 against the E-350's 1,049 — a 1.3% lead for the E-350. L3 cache: 1 MB on the Celeron G440 vs 0 kB on the E-350.

Feature	Celeron G440	E-350
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	1 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB	512K (per core)+100%
Process	32 nm-20%	40 nm
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Zacate (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,035	1,049+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	300	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G440 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the E-350 uses FT1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G440	E-350
Socket	LGA1155	FT1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron G440) / not specified (E-350). The Celeron G440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the E-350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G440 rivals Pentium G630.

Feature	Celeron G440	E-350
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron G440 was priced at $37, while the E-350 came in at $50. On launch pricing ($37 vs $50), Celeron G440 was $13 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G440 delivers 28.0 pts/$ vs 21.0 pts/$ for the E-350 — making the Celeron G440 the 28.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron G440	E-350
MSRP	$37-26%	$50
Performance per Dollar	28.0+33%	21.0
Release Date	2011	2011

Search Celeron G440 on Amazon

Search E-350 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.