Celeron N2930 vs Core 2 Duo E6750

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2930 vs Core 2 Duo E6750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2930 vs Core 2 Duo E6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2930

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 7W instead of 65W, a 58W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Core 2 Duo E6750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6750.

Core 2 Duo E6750

2007

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron N2930.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,029 vs 1,032).
❌Launch MSRP is still $183 MSRP, while Celeron N2930 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌828.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 7W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2930 better than Core 2 Duo E6750?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E6750 is ahead with a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2930 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2930 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2930 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Celeron N2930 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $183 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. Core 2 Duo E6750 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron N2930 vs Core 2 Duo E6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron N2930

The Celeron N2930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo E6750

The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron N2930 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron N2930 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2930 versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — a 21.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 1.83 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron N2930 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2930 scores 1,032 against the Core 2 Duo E6750's 1,029 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron N2930. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Celeron N2930	Core 2 Duo E6750
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.16 GHz	2.67 GHz+24%
Base Clock	1.83 GHz	2.66 GHz+45%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+12700%	4 MB
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)	Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,032	1,029
Geekbench 6 Single	170	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	502	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2930 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. The Core 2 Duo E6750 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron N2930) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E6750) — the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Celeron N2930) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750).

Feature	Celeron N2930	Core 2 Duo E6750
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Celeron N2930) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6750). The Celeron N2930 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.