Celeron N2930 vs Pentium N3510

Intel

Celeron N2930

4 Cores4 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium N3510

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······

Celeron N2930 vs Pentium N3510 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron N2930 vs Pentium N3510 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron N2930 vs Pentium N3510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron N2930

2014

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Pentium N3510 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,032 vs 1,040).
  • 250% higher power demand at 7W vs 2W.

Pentium N3510

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 2W instead of 7W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while Celeron N2930 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2930 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3510 better than Celeron N2930?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron N2930 is ahead with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N3510 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N3510 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Pentium N3510 is the better buy right now. Pentium N3510 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $161 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark. The compromise is that Celeron N2930 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (6.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N2930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron N2930 vs Pentium N3510 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Celeron N2930

The Celeron N2930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium N3510

The Pentium N3510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,040 points. Launch price was $161.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron N2930 and Pentium N3510 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2930 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium N3510 — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Celeron N2930 (base: 1.83 GHz vs 2 GHz). Both are built on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron N2930 scores 1,032 against the Pentium N3510's 1,040 — a 0.8% lead for the Pentium N3510. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2930 vs 2 MB on the Pentium N3510.

FeatureCeleron N2930Pentium N3510
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
2.16 GHz+8%
2 GHz
Base Clock
1.83 GHz
2 GHz+9%
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+25500%
2 MB
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark
1,032
1,040
Geekbench 6 Single
170
Geekbench 6 Multi
502
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 2.0.

FeatureCeleron N2930Pentium N3510
Socket
FCBGA1170
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Celeron N2930) / not specified (Pentium N3510). The Celeron N2930 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Pentium N3510 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron N2930Pentium N3510
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes