CPU
GPU
Celeron J1850
Celeron N2930
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1850 is positioned at rank 110 and the Celeron N2930 is on rank 1087, so the Celeron J1850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1850
Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2930
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron J1850 | Celeron N2930 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($82) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron J1850 | Celeron N2930 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($82) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2930
Celeron J1850
The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.
Celeron N2930
The Celeron N2930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2930 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 versus 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2930 — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Celeron N2930 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.83 GHz). The Celeron J1850 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron N2930 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1850 scores 1,035 against the Celeron N2930's 1,032 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron J1850. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 170, a 5.7% lead for the Celeron J1850 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 450 vs 502 (10.9% advantage for the Celeron N2930). L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850 vs 0 kB on the Celeron N2930.
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Celeron N2930 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.16 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz+9% | 1.83 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 1,035 | 1,032 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180+6% | 170 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 450 | 502+12% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 4 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1850) and SoC (Celeron N2930).
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Celeron N2930 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333 | DDR3L-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J1850) vs Yes (Celeron N2930). Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron J1850) and Intel HD Graphics (Celeron N2930) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900.
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Celeron N2930 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | Intel HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | Yes |
| Target Use | Low Power | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron J1850 and Celeron N2930
