PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2981U vs Celeron J1850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2981U vs Celeron J1850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2981U

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅200% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 12.6 PassMark/$ ($137 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Celeron J1850

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $137 MSRP).
✅Delivers 66.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $137 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,035 vs 1,036).

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J1850 better than Celeron 2981U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron J1850 is ahead with 25% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2981U pulls ahead with 0.1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2981U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J1850 is the better buy right now. Celeron J1850 comes in $55 cheaper on MSRP at $82 MSRP versus $137 MSRP, and it still gives you 25% higher max boost clock. The compromise is that Celeron 2981U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.1% better PassMark. It is also 66.9% better value on MSRP (12.6 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 2981U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 2981U vs Celeron J1850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2981U

The Celeron 2981U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,036 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron J1850

The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 2981U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J1850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J1850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 2981U versus 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Celeron J1850 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron 2981U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron J1850 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2981U scores 1,036 against the Celeron J1850's 1,035 — a 0.1% lead for the Celeron 2981U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 2981U vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850.

Feature	Celeron 2981U	Celeron J1850
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache	2 MB	2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark	1,036	1,035
Geekbench 6 Single	—	180
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	450

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2981U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J1850 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 2981U versus DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1850 — the Celeron 2981U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 2981U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 2981U) vs 4 (Celeron J1850) — the Celeron 2981U offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 2981U) and N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1850).

Feature	Celeron 2981U	Celeron J1850
Socket	FCBGA1168	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+20%	DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	12+200%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron 2981U) and HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Celeron J1850) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2981U targets Budget, Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron 2981U rivals Pentium 2117U; Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900.

Feature	Celeron 2981U	Celeron J1850
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Haswell)	HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	VT-x
Target Use	Budget	Low Power

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 2981U was priced at $137, while the Celeron J1850 came in at $82. On launch pricing ($137 vs $82), Celeron J1850 was $55 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2981U delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 12.6 pts/$ for the Celeron J1850 — making the Celeron J1850 the 50.1% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 2981U	Celeron J1850
MSRP	$137	$82-40%
Performance per Dollar	7.6	12.6+66%
Release Date	2014	2013

Search Celeron 2981U on Amazon

Search Celeron J1850 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.