
Athlon II N350

Celeron 2981U
Athlon II N350 vs Celeron 2981U Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II N350 vs Celeron 2981U FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II N350 vs Celeron 2981U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II N350
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $37 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $137 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 10.4 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $137 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 2981U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Celeron 2981U
2014Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Athlon II N350 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,036 vs 1,045).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($137 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II N350 better than Celeron 2981U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II N350 vs Celeron 2981U Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II N350
The Athlon II N350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,045 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron 2981U
The Celeron 2981U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,036 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II N350 and Celeron 2981U share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon II N350 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 2981U — a 40% clock advantage for the Athlon II N350. The Athlon II N350 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 2981U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II N350 scores 1,045 against the Celeron 2981U's 1,036 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon II N350.
| Feature | Athlon II N350 | Celeron 2981U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz+50% | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Champlain (2010−2011) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 1,045 | 1,036 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 210 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 400 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II N350 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 2981U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II N350 versus DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 2981U — the Celeron 2981U supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 2981U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II N350) vs 12 (Celeron 2981U) — the Celeron 2981U offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: RS880M,SB850 (Athlon II N350) and Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 2981U).
| Feature | Athlon II N350 | Celeron 2981U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | FCBGA1168 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | DDR3L-1600+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 12 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II N350) vs VT-x (Celeron 2981U). The Celeron 2981U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Athlon II N350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II N350 targets Legacy Laptop, Celeron 2981U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon II N350 rivals Pentium P6100; Celeron 2981U rivals Pentium 2117U.
| Feature | Athlon II N350 | Celeron 2981U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | HD Graphics (Haswell) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | Budget |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II N350 was priced at $100, while the Celeron 2981U came in at $137. On launch pricing ($100 vs $137), Athlon II N350 was $37 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II N350 delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 7.6 pts/$ for the Celeron 2981U — making the Athlon II N350 the 32.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II N350 | Celeron 2981U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-27% | $137 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4+37% | 7.6 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2014 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















