A6-9220C vs Athlon II N350

A6-9220C vs Athlon II N350 Performance Spectrum

A6-9220C

2 / 2

1,053

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II N350

2 / 2

1,045

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-9220C vs Athlon II N350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-9220C vs Athlon II N350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-9220C

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon R5, while Athlon II N350 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌500% higher power demand at 6W vs 1W.

Athlon II N350

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 6W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,045 vs 1,053).
❌Launch MSRP is still $100 MSRP, while A6-9220C mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-9220C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-9220C better than Athlon II N350?

Yes. A6-9220C is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-9220C is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-9220C is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-9220C is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-9220C comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Athlon II N350 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (10.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on S1.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-9220C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-9220C vs Athlon II N350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-9220C

The A6-9220C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,053 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon II N350

The Athlon II N350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,045 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220C and Athlon II N350 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A6-9220C versus 2.4 GHz on the Athlon II N350 — a 11.8% clock advantage for the A6-9220C. The A6-9220C uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II N350 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220C scores 1,053 against the Athlon II N350's 1,045 — a 0.8% lead for the A6-9220C.

Feature	A6-9220C	Athlon II N350
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+13%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	1.8 GHz	—
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)	1 MB
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)	Champlain (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,053	1,045
Geekbench 6 Single	—	210
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	400

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220C uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II N350 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A6-9220C versus DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II N350 — the A6-9220C supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220C) vs 2 (Athlon II N350). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220C) vs 0 (Athlon II N350) — the A6-9220C offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220C) and RS880M,SB850 (Athlon II N350).

Feature	A6-9220C	Athlon II N350
Socket	FT4	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866+75%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9220C) / AMD-V (Athlon II N350). The A6-9220C includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Athlon II N350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II N350 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II N350 rivals Pentium P6100.