
Athlon II N350

Athlon II X2 220
Athlon II N350 vs Athlon II X2 220 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II N350 vs Athlon II X2 220 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II N350 vs Athlon II X2 220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II N350
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 1W instead of 65W, a 64W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (210 vs 285).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (400 vs 500).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $32 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 220.
Athlon II X2 220
2010Why buy it
- ✅+35.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $68 less on MSRP ($32 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 212.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($32 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Athlon II N350.
Trade-offs
- ❌6400% higher power demand at 65W vs 1W.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 220 better than Athlon II N350?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II N350 vs Athlon II X2 220 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II N350
The Athlon II N350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,045 points. Launch price was $149.

Athlon II X2 220
The Athlon II X2 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $32.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II N350 and Athlon II X2 220 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Athlon II N350 versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 220 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 220. The Athlon II N350 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon II X2 220 uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II N350 scores 1,045 against the Athlon II X2 220's 1,046 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon II X2 220. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 210 vs 285, a 30.3% lead for the Athlon II X2 220 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 400 vs 500 (22.2% advantage for the Athlon II X2 220).
| Feature | Athlon II N350 | Athlon II X2 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz+17% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Champlain (2010−2011) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,045 | 1,046 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 210 | 285+36% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 400 | 500+25% |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II N350 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 220 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Athlon II N350 versus 1333 on the Athlon II X2 220 — the Athlon II X2 220 supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 220 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: RS880M,SB850 (Athlon II N350) and AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 220).
| Feature | Athlon II N350 | Athlon II X2 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1066 | 1333+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II N350) vs true (Athlon II X2 220). Primary use case: Athlon II N350 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II N350 rivals Pentium P6100; Athlon II X2 220 rivals Pentium E5500.
| Feature | Athlon II N350 | Athlon II X2 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | true |
| Target Use | Legacy Laptop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II N350 was priced at $100, while the Athlon II X2 220 came in at $32. On launch pricing ($100 vs $32), Athlon II X2 220 was $68 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II N350 delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 32.7 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 220 — making the Athlon II X2 220 the 103.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II N350 | Athlon II X2 220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $32-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.4 | 32.7+214% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















