Athlon II N350 vs Celeron T3500

Athlon II N350 vs Celeron T3500 Performance Spectrum

Athlon II N350

2 / 2

1,045

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron T3500

1,055

+1.0%

Core Duo T2050

Celeron N3000

Celeron J1800

Pentium Dual-Core E2180

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II N350 vs Celeron T3500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II N350 vs Celeron T3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II N350

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 35W, a 34W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,045 vs 1,055).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.4 vs 13.2 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Celeron T3500

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 13.2 vs 10.4 PassMark/$ ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌3400% higher power demand at 35W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron T3500 better than Athlon II N350?

Yes. Celeron T3500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron T3500 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron T3500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron T3500 is the better buy right now. Celeron T3500 comes in $20 cheaper on MSRP at $80 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 26.2% better value on MSRP (13.2 vs 10.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron T3500 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Athlon II N350 vs Celeron T3500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II N350

The Athlon II N350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,045 points. Launch price was $149.

Celeron T3500

The Celeron T3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Athlon II N350 is built on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon II N350 scores 1,045 against the Celeron T3500's 1,055 — a 1% lead for the Celeron T3500.

Feature	Athlon II N350	Celeron T3500
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	—
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	—
Base Clock	—	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	—	1 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	—
Process	45 nm	45 nm
Architecture	Champlain (2010−2011)	—
PassMark	1,045	1,055
Geekbench 6 Single	210	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	400	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II N350 uses the S1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron T3500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Athlon II N350	Celeron T3500
Socket	S1	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	0	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II N350) / not specified (Celeron T3500). Primary use case: Athlon II N350 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Athlon II N350 rivals Pentium P6100.

Feature	Athlon II N350	Celeron T3500
Integrated GPU	No	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	AMD-V	—
Target Use	Legacy Laptop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II N350 was priced at $100, while the Celeron T3500 came in at $80. On launch pricing ($100 vs $80), Celeron T3500 was $20 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II N350 delivers 10.4 pts/$ vs 13.2 pts/$ for the Celeron T3500 — making the Celeron T3500 the 23.2% better value option.

Feature	Athlon II N350	Celeron T3500
MSRP	$100	$80-20%
Performance per Dollar	10.4	13.2+27%
Release Date	2010	2010

Search Athlon II N350 on Amazon

Search Celeron T3500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.