Celeron 2981U vs Pentium E6300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2981U vs Pentium E6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2981U vs Pentium E6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2981U

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Haswell), while Pentium E6300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 7.6 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($137 MSRP vs $84 MSRP).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Pentium E6300

2009

Why buy it

✅Costs $53 less on MSRP ($84 MSRP vs $137 MSRP).
✅Delivers 62.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 7.6 PassMark/$ ($84 MSRP vs $137 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,032 vs 1,036).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 2981U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E6300 better than Celeron 2981U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Pentium E6300 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2981U pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2981U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E6300 is the better buy right now. Pentium E6300 comes in $53 cheaper on MSRP at $84 MSRP versus $137 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Celeron 2981U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.4% better PassMark. It is also 62.5% better value on MSRP (12.3 vs 7.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 2981U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron 2981U vs Pentium E6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 2981U

The Celeron 2981U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,036 points. Launch price was $69.

Pentium E6300

The Pentium E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $40.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2981U and Pentium E6300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 2981U versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E6300 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Pentium E6300 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron 2981U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium E6300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2981U scores 1,036 against the Pentium E6300's 1,032 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 2981U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 2981U vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6300.

Feature	Celeron 2981U	Pentium E6300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.8 GHz+75%
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	2.8 GHz+75%
L3 Cache	2 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB (total)+300%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,036	1,032

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2981U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E6300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 2981U	Pentium E6300
Socket	FCBGA1168	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 2981U) / not specified (Pentium E6300). The Celeron 2981U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Pentium E6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2981U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2981U rivals Pentium 2117U.

Feature	Celeron 2981U	Pentium E6300
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Haswell)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Budget	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron 2981U was priced at $137, while the Pentium E6300 came in at $84. On launch pricing ($137 vs $84), Pentium E6300 was $53 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron 2981U delivers 7.6 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Pentium E6300 — making the Pentium E6300 the 47.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron 2981U	Pentium E6300
MSRP	$137	$84-39%
Performance per Dollar	7.6	12.3+62%
Release Date	2014	2009

Search Celeron 2981U on Amazon

Search Pentium E6300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.