Celeron 2981U
VS
Pentium E6300

Celeron 2981U vs Pentium E6300

Intel

Celeron 2981U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Pentium E6300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron 2981U is positioned at rank 426 and the Pentium E6300 is on rank 958, so the Celeron 2981U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 2981U

#414
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
566%
#415
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
558%
#416
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
512%
#417
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
510%
#418
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
505%
#420
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
488%
#421
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
468%
#422
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
467%
#423
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
455%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E6300

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
25363%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
23966%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
17401%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5242%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4152%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3633%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2081%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2053%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1870%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1869%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1849%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1799%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1774%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1766%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1750%
#958
Pentium E6300
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
100%
#959
Core i5-661
MSRP: $196|Avg: $40
99%
#960
Core i3-4150
MSRP: $281|Avg: $70
99%
#961
Core i5-750
MSRP: $210|Avg: $30
99%
#962
Core i3-2100T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $127
98%
#963
Pentium E2210
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
97%
#964
Core i3-560
MSRP: $138|Avg: $10
97%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
96%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
96%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
96%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
95%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
95%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
95%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
94%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Pentium E6300 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 2981U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron 2981UPentium E6300
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($137)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium E6300 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 89% cheaper ($15 vs $137) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCeleron 2981UPentium E6300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+810%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($137)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron 2981U and Pentium E6300

Intel

Celeron 2981U

The Celeron 2981U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,036 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium E6300

The Pentium E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $40.

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 2981U and Pentium E6300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 2981U versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E6300 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Pentium E6300 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron 2981U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium E6300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2981U scores 1,036 against the Pentium E6300's 1,032 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 2981U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 2981U vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6300.

FeatureCeleron 2981UPentium E6300
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+75%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
2 MB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
2 MB (total)+300%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,036
1,032
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 2981U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E6300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron 2981UPentium E6300
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 2981U) / not specified (Pentium E6300). The Celeron 2981U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Haswell)), while the Pentium E6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2981U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2981U rivals Pentium 2117U.

FeatureCeleron 2981UPentium E6300
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Haswell)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Celeron 2981U launched at $137 MSRP, while the Pentium E6300 debuted at $84.

FeatureCeleron 2981UPentium E6300
MSRP
$137
$84-39%
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Release Date
2014
2009