Celeron 2981U vs Core i3-330M

Intel

Celeron 2981U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i3-330M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 0.13 GHz2010

Celeron 2981U vs Core i3-330M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 2981U vs Core i3-330M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 2981U vs Core i3-330M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 2981U

2014

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
    • ❌Launch MSRP is still $137 MSRP, while Core i3-330M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Core i3-330M

    2010

    Why buy it

    • βœ…+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
    • βœ…33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Lower PassMark (1,032 vs 1,036).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Celeron 2981U better than Core i3-330M?
    Yes. Celeron 2981U is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Celeron 2981U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron 2981U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Celeron 2981U is the better buy right now. Celeron 2981U comes in at an unclear MSRP at $137 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Celeron 2981U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Celeron 2981U vs Core i3-330M Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Celeron 2981U

    The Celeron 2981U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,036 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Core i3-330M

    The Core i3-330M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010βˆ’2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $49.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    The Celeron 2981U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i3-330M's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Celeron 2981U versus 0.13 GHz on the Core i3-330M β€” a 169.9% clock advantage for the Celeron 2981U (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Celeron 2981U uses the Haswell (2013βˆ’2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i3-330M uses Arrandale (2010βˆ’2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 2981U scores 1,036 against the Core i3-330M's 1,032 β€” a 0.4% lead for the Celeron 2981U. L3 cache: 2 MB on the Celeron 2981U vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-330M.

    FeatureCeleron 2981UCore i3-330M
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    1.6 GHz+1131%
    0.13 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.6 GHz
    2.13 GHz+33%
    L3 Cache
    2 MB
    3 MB (total)+50%
    L2 Cache
    512 kB+100%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    22 nm-31%
    32 nm
    Architecture
    Haswell (2013βˆ’2015)
    Arrandale (2010βˆ’2011)
    PassMark
    1,036
    1,032
    Geekbench 6 Single
    β€”
    317
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    β€”
    689
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Celeron 2981U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-330M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 2981U versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i3-330M β€” the Celeron 2981U supports 50.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 2981U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB β€” 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Celeron 2981U) vs 16 (Core i3-330M) β€” the Core i3-330M offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 2981U) and HM55,PM55,QM57 (Core i3-330M).

    FeatureCeleron 2981UCore i3-330M
    Socket
    FCBGA1168
    PGA988
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3L-1600+50%
    DDR3-1066
    Max RAM Capacity
    16 GB+100%
    8 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    12
    16+33%
    πŸ”§

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 2981U) vs VT-x / EPT (Core i3-330M). Both include integrated graphics β€” HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron 2981U) and Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale) (Core i3-330M) β€” useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 2981U targets Budget, Core i3-330M targets Legacy Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 2981U rivals Pentium 2117U; Core i3-330M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.

    FeatureCeleron 2981UCore i3-330M
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    HD Graphics (Haswell)
    Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale)
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x
    VT-x / EPT
    Target Use
    Budget
    Legacy Budget