Celeron J1850 vs Pentium 3558U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J1850 vs Pentium 3558U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J1850 vs Pentium 3558U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J1850

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium 3558U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,035 vs 1,041).
❌Launch MSRP is still $82 MSRP, while Pentium 3558U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium 3558U

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1850 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J1850 better than Pentium 3558U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron J1850 is ahead with 17.6% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 3558U pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 3558U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J1850 is the better buy right now. Celeron J1850 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $82 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 17.6% higher max boost clock. The compromise is that Pentium 3558U is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium 3558U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J1850 vs Pentium 3558U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J1850

The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.

Pentium 3558U

The Pentium 3558U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,041 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J1850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium 3558U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J1850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium 3558U — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Celeron J1850 (base: 2 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron J1850 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium 3558U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1850 scores 1,035 against the Pentium 3558U's 1,041 — a 0.6% lead for the Pentium 3558U. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850 vs 2 MB on the Pentium 3558U.

Feature	Celeron J1850	Pentium 3558U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz+18%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz+18%	1.7 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	2 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	512 kB
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,035	1,041
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1850 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 3558U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron J1850	Pentium 3558U
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J1850) / not specified (Pentium 3558U). The Celeron J1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium 3558U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900.