Celeron J1850 vs Pentium N3510

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J1850 vs Pentium N3510 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J1850 vs Pentium N3510: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J1850

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅Delivers 95.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 6.5 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $161 MSRP).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Pentium N3510 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,035 vs 1,040).

Pentium N3510

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.5% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.5 vs 12.6 PassMark/$ ($161 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1850 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium N3510 better than Celeron J1850?

Yes. Pentium N3510 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.5% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium N3510 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium N3510 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Pentium N3510 comes in 96.3% more expensive on MSRP at $161 MSRP versus $82 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% higher PassMark. Celeron J1850 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pentium N3510 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J1850 vs Pentium N3510 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J1850

The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.

Pentium N3510

The Pentium N3510 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 December 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,040 points. Launch price was $161.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron J1850 and Pentium N3510 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium N3510 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Celeron J1850 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium N3510 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1850 scores 1,035 against the Pentium N3510's 1,040 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium N3510. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850 vs 2 MB on the Pentium N3510.

Feature	Celeron J1850	Pentium N3510
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
Base Clock	2 GHz	2 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	2 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,035	1,040
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA1170 socket with PCIe 2.0.

Feature	Celeron J1850	Pentium N3510
Socket	FCBGA1170	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	4	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J1850) / not specified (Pentium N3510). The Celeron J1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Pentium N3510 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900.

Feature	Celeron J1850	Pentium N3510
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x	—
Target Use	Low Power	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron J1850 was priced at $82, while the Pentium N3510 came in at $161. On launch pricing ($82 vs $161), Celeron J1850 was $79 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron J1850 delivers 12.6 pts/$ vs 6.5 pts/$ for the Pentium N3510 — making the Celeron J1850 the 64.6% better value option.

Feature	Celeron J1850	Pentium N3510
MSRP	$82-49%	$161
Performance per Dollar	12.6+94%	6.5
Release Date	2013	2013

Search Celeron J1850 on Amazon

Search Pentium N3510 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.