Celeron J1850 vs Core 2 Duo E8300

Celeron J1850

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Core 2 Duo E8300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.83 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron J1850

4 / 4

1,035

0.0%

1,039

+0.4%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1850 is positioned at rank 110 and the Core 2 Duo E8300 is on rank 1060, so the Celeron J1850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1850

#31

Ryzen 5 230

MSRP: $200|Avg: $190

98%

#98

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

283%

#99

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

279%

#100

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

256%

#101

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

255%

#102

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

253%

#104

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

244%

#105

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

234%

#106

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

234%

#107

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

228%

#110

Celeron J1850

MSRP: $82|Avg: N/A

100%

#114

Core i3-4100M

MSRP: $225|Avg: $99

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8300

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

48935%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

46239%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

33573%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

10114%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

8011%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

7008%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

4014%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

3962%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

3607%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

3607%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

3567%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

3470%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

3422%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

3408%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

3377%

#1060

Core 2 Duo E8300

MSRP: $163|Avg: $20

100%

#1061

Phenom X4 9500

MSRP: $247|Avg: $30

99%

#1062

Celeron D 352

MSRP: $69|Avg: $15

95%

#1063

Core i7-970

MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289

95%

#1064

Core i7-880

MSRP: $583|Avg: $40

92%

#1065

Pentium D 820

MSRP: $241|Avg: $20

92%

#1066

Celeron 2.10

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

91%

#1067

Core i7-950

MSRP: $562|Avg: $15

91%

#1068

Sempron 3100+

MSRP: $65|Avg: $15

90%

#1069

Athlon II X4 635

MSRP: $400|Avg: $250

88%

#1070

Core 2 Duo E6750

MSRP: $183|Avg: $15

88%

#1071

Core i7-940

MSRP: $562|Avg: $90

85%

#1072

Celeron 2.40

MSRP: $69|Avg: $13

78%

#1073

Sempron 2800+

MSRP: $65|Avg: $29

77%

#1074

Athlon 64 3100+

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

75%

#1075

Sempron 3600+

MSRP: $105|Avg: $20

73%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core 2 Duo E8300 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron J1850 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.

Insight	Celeron J1850	Core 2 Duo E8300
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($82)	✅ More affordable ($20)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core 2 Duo E8300 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 76% cheaper ($20 vs $82) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	Celeron J1850	Core 2 Duo E8300
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+312%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($82)	✅ More affordable ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron J1850 Benchmark Check

Core 2 Duo E8300 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1850 and Core 2 Duo E8300

Celeron J1850

The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.

Core 2 Duo E8300

The Core 2 Duo E8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 2.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,039 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J1850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E8300 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J1850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 versus 2.83 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8300 — a 34.4% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8300 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.83 GHz). The Celeron J1850 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1850 scores 1,035 against the Core 2 Duo E8300's 1,039 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 345, a 62.9% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8300 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 450 vs 771 (52.6% advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8300). L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E8300.

Feature	Celeron J1850	Core 2 Duo E8300
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.83 GHz+42%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.83 GHz+42%
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	6 MB (total)+200%
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,035	1,039
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	1,000
Geekbench 6 Single	180	345+92%
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	771+71%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1850 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. The Core 2 Duo E8300 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J1850) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E8300) — the Core 2 Duo E8300 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1850) and P35,P45,G33,G31 (Core 2 Duo E8300).

Feature	Celeron J1850	Core 2 Duo E8300
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Celeron J1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo E8300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1850 targets Low Power, Core 2 Duo E8300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900.