Athlon II X2 270u
Celeron J1850
Athlon II X2 270u vs Celeron J1850 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 270u vs Celeron J1850 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Call of Duty: Warzone
Cyberpunk 2077
Athlon II X2 270u vs Celeron J1850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 270u
2010Why buy it
- ✅+66.7% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($68 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.4 vs 12.6 PassMark/$ ($68 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Celeron J1850.
Trade-offs
- ❌1150% higher power demand at 25W vs 2W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1850 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Celeron J1850
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 25W, a 23W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Athlon II X2 270u needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (180 vs 300).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (450 vs 550).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.6 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $68 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 270u.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 270u better than Celeron J1850?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 270u vs Celeron J1850 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Athlon II X2 270u
The Athlon II X2 270u is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,045 points. Launch price was $68.
Celeron J1850
The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X2 270u packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J1850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J1850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270u versus 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon II X2 270u uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron J1850 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 270u scores 1,045 against the Celeron J1850's 1,035 — a 1% lead for the Athlon II X2 270u. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 180, a 50% lead for the Athlon II X2 270u that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 550 vs 450 (20% advantage for the Athlon II X2 270u). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 270u vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270u | Celeron J1850 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 2 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 22 nm-51% |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| PassMark | 1,045 | 1,035 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 531 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 300+67% | 180 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 550+22% | 450 |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 270u uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron J1850 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X2 270u supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X2 270u) vs 4 (Celeron J1850) — the Athlon II X2 270u offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 760G,AMD 880G,AMD 970 (Athlon II X2 270u) and N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1850).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270u | Celeron J1850 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | FCBGA1170 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3L-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 270u) vs VT-x (Celeron J1850). The Celeron J1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Athlon II X2 270u requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 270u targets Office/Budget Desktop, Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 270u rivals Pentium E5700; Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270u | Celeron J1850 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Office/Budget Desktop | Low Power |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 270u was priced at $68, while the Celeron J1850 came in at $82. On launch pricing ($68 vs $82), Athlon II X2 270u was $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 270u delivers 15.4 pts/$ vs 12.6 pts/$ for the Celeron J1850 — making the Athlon II X2 270u the 19.6% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270u | Celeron J1850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $68-17% | $82 |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.4+22% | 12.6 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Athlon II X2 270u and Celeron J1850
