Athlon II X2 270u
VS
Celeron J1850

Athlon II X2 270u vs Celeron J1850

AMD

Athlon II X2 270u

2 Cores2 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Celeron J1850

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Athlon II X2 270u is positioned at rank 897 and the Celeron J1850 is on rank 110, so the Celeron J1850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 270u

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
20281%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
19163%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13914%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4192%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3320%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2905%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1664%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1642%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1495%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1495%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1478%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1438%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1418%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1412%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1400%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
96%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
100%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
99%
#899
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
97%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
96%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
95%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
95%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#908
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
94%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
94%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
94%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
93%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1850

#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
98%
#98
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
283%
#99
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
279%
#100
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
256%
#101
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
255%
#102
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
253%
#104
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
244%
#105
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
234%
#106
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
234%
#107
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
228%
#110
Celeron J1850
MSRP: $82|Avg: N/A
100%
#114
Core i3-4100M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $99
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Athlon II X2 270u delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron J1850 in both compute-intensive tasks (1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightAthlon II X2 270uCeleron J1850
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($82)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon II X2 270u stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 88% cheaper ($10 vs $82) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightAthlon II X2 270uCeleron J1850
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+728%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($82)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 270u and Celeron J1850

AMD

Athlon II X2 270u

The Athlon II X2 270u is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,045 points. Launch price was $68.

Intel

Celeron J1850

The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.

Processing Power

The Athlon II X2 270u packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron J1850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J1850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270u versus 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 — identical boost frequencies. The Athlon II X2 270u uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron J1850 uses Bay Trail-D (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 270u scores 1,045 against the Celeron J1850's 1,035 — a 1% lead for the Athlon II X2 270u. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 300 vs 180, a 50% lead for the Athlon II X2 270u that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 550 vs 450 (20% advantage for the Athlon II X2 270u). L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 270u vs 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850.

FeatureAthlon II X2 270uCeleron J1850
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
45 nm
22 nm-51%
Architecture
Regor (2009−2013)
Bay Trail-D (2013)
PassMark
1,045
1,035
Cinebench R23 Multi
531
Geekbench 6 Single
300+67%
180
Geekbench 6 Multi
550+22%
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 270u uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron J1850 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X2 270u supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X2 270u) vs 4 (Celeron J1850) — the Athlon II X2 270u offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 760G,AMD 880G,AMD 970 (Athlon II X2 270u) and N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1850).

FeatureAthlon II X2 270uCeleron J1850
Socket
AM3
FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+300%
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 270u) vs VT-x (Celeron J1850). The Celeron J1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Athlon II X2 270u requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 270u targets Office/Budget Desktop, Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 270u rivals Pentium E5700; Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900.

FeatureAthlon II X2 270uCeleron J1850
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics (Bay Trail)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Office/Budget Desktop
Low Power
💰

Value Analysis

The Athlon II X2 270u launched at $68 MSRP, while the Celeron J1850 debuted at $82.

FeatureAthlon II X2 270uCeleron J1850
MSRP
$68-17%
$82
Avg Price (30d)
$10
Release Date
2010
2013