Athlon II X2 270u vs Athlon X2 BE-2400

AMD

Athlon II X2 270u

2 Cores2 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2010
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Athlon X2 BE-2400

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Athlon II X2 270u vs Athlon X2 BE-2400 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Athlon II X2 270u vs Athlon X2 BE-2400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Athlon II X2 270u vs Athlon X2 BE-2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Athlon II X2 270u

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 25W instead of 45W, a 20W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Athlon X2 BE-2400.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,045 vs 1,050).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 17.5 PassMark/$ ($68 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Athlon X2 BE-2400

2007

Why buy it

  • Costs $8 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $68 MSRP).
  • Delivers 13.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.5 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $68 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 80% higher power demand at 45W vs 25W.
  • No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 270u.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon X2 BE-2400 better than Athlon II X2 270u?
Yes. Athlon X2 BE-2400 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Athlon X2 BE-2400 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 15% higher max boost clock.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon X2 BE-2400 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Athlon X2 BE-2400 is the better buy right now. Athlon X2 BE-2400 comes in $8 cheaper on MSRP at $60 MSRP versus $68 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.5% higher PassMark. It is also 13.9% better value on MSRP (17.5 vs 15.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 270u makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Athlon II X2 270u vs Athlon X2 BE-2400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Athlon II X2 270u

The Athlon II X2 270u is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,045 points. Launch price was $68.

AMD

Athlon X2 BE-2400

The Athlon X2 BE-2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Athlon II X2 270u and Athlon X2 BE-2400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270u versus 2.3 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 — a 14% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 BE-2400. The Athlon II X2 270u uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses Brisbane (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 270u scores 1,045 against the Athlon X2 BE-2400's 1,050 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon X2 BE-2400. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureAthlon II X2 270uAthlon X2 BE-2400
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.3 GHz+15%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
512 kB
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Regor (2009−2013)
Brisbane (2007−2008)
PassMark
1,045
1,050
Cinebench R23 Multi
531
Geekbench 6 Single
300
Geekbench 6 Multi
550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Athlon II X2 270u uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 270u versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 — the Athlon II X2 270u supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X2 270u) vs 0 (Athlon X2 BE-2400) — the Athlon II X2 270u offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 760G,AMD 880G,AMD 970 (Athlon II X2 270u) and AMD AM2 (Athlon X2 BE-2400).

FeatureAthlon II X2 270uAthlon X2 BE-2400
Socket
AM3
AM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+67%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 270u) / not specified (Athlon X2 BE-2400). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 270u targets Office/Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 270u rivals Pentium E5700.

FeatureAthlon II X2 270uAthlon X2 BE-2400
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Office/Budget Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Athlon II X2 270u was priced at $68, while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($68 vs $60), Athlon X2 BE-2400 was $8 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 270u delivers 15.4 pts/$ vs 17.5 pts/$ for the Athlon X2 BE-2400 — making the Athlon X2 BE-2400 the 13% better value option.

FeatureAthlon II X2 270uAthlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP
$68
$60-12%
Performance per Dollar
15.4
17.5+14%
Release Date
2010
2007

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.