
Athlon II X2 270u

Athlon X2 BE-2400
Athlon II X2 270u vs Athlon X2 BE-2400 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 270u vs Athlon X2 BE-2400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 270u vs Athlon X2 BE-2400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 270u
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 45W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Athlon X2 BE-2400.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,045 vs 1,050).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 17.5 PassMark/$ ($68 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Athlon X2 BE-2400
2007Why buy it
- ✅Costs $8 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $68 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 13.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.5 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $68 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌80% higher power demand at 45W vs 25W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 270u.
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon X2 BE-2400 better than Athlon II X2 270u?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 270u vs Athlon X2 BE-2400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 270u
The Athlon II X2 270u is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,045 points. Launch price was $68.

Athlon X2 BE-2400
The Athlon X2 BE-2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 270u and Athlon X2 BE-2400 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270u versus 2.3 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 — a 14% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 BE-2400. The Athlon II X2 270u uses the Regor (2009−2013) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses Brisbane (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 270u scores 1,045 against the Athlon X2 BE-2400's 1,050 — a 0.5% lead for the Athlon X2 BE-2400. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270u | Athlon X2 BE-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+15% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 512 kB |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Brisbane (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,045 | 1,050 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 531 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 300 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 550 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 270u uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 270u versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 — the Athlon II X2 270u supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Athlon II X2 270u) vs 0 (Athlon X2 BE-2400) — the Athlon II X2 270u offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 760G,AMD 880G,AMD 970 (Athlon II X2 270u) and AMD AM2 (Athlon X2 BE-2400).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270u | Athlon X2 BE-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+67% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: AMD-V (Athlon II X2 270u) / not specified (Athlon X2 BE-2400). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 270u targets Office/Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 270u rivals Pentium E5700.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270u | Athlon X2 BE-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | — |
| Target Use | Office/Budget Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 270u was priced at $68, while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($68 vs $60), Athlon X2 BE-2400 was $8 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 270u delivers 15.4 pts/$ vs 17.5 pts/$ for the Athlon X2 BE-2400 — making the Athlon X2 BE-2400 the 13% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 270u | Athlon X2 BE-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $68 | $60-12% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.4 | 17.5+14% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2007 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















