
Athlon II X2 220

Athlon II X2 270u
Athlon II X2 220 vs Athlon II X2 270u Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Athlon II X2 220 vs Athlon II X2 270u FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Athlon II X2 220 vs Athlon II X2 270u: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Athlon II X2 220
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $36 less on MSRP ($32 MSRP vs $68 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 112.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($32 MSRP vs $68 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (285 vs 300).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (500 vs 550).
- ❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
Athlon II X2 270u
2010Why buy it
- ✅+5.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.4 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($68 MSRP vs $32 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Athlon II X2 270u better than Athlon II X2 220?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Athlon II X2 220 vs Athlon II X2 270u Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Athlon II X2 220
The Athlon II X2 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $32.

Athlon II X2 270u
The Athlon II X2 270u is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,045 points. Launch price was $68.
Processing Power
Both the Athlon II X2 220 and Athlon II X2 270u share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X2 220 versus 2 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270u — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 220. Both are built on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture using a 45 nm process. In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 220 scores 1,046 against the Athlon II X2 270u's 1,045 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon II X2 220. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 285 vs 300, a 5.1% lead for the Athlon II X2 270u that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 500 vs 550 (9.5% advantage for the Athlon II X2 270u). Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 220 | Athlon II X2 270u |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+40% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,046 | 1,045 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 531 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 285 | 300+5% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 500 | 550+10% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM3 socket with PCIe 2.0. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Athlon II X2 220) vs 16 (Athlon II X2 270u) — the Athlon II X2 270u offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM2+,AM3 (Athlon II X2 220) and AMD 760G,AMD 880G,AMD 970 (Athlon II X2 270u).
| Feature | Athlon II X2 220 | Athlon II X2 270u |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Athlon II X2 220) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X2 270u). Primary use case: Athlon II X2 270u targets Office/Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 220 rivals Pentium E5500; Athlon II X2 270u rivals Pentium E5700.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 220 | Athlon II X2 270u |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Office/Budget Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Athlon II X2 220 was priced at $32, while the Athlon II X2 270u came in at $68. On launch pricing ($32 vs $68), Athlon II X2 220 was $36 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 220 delivers 32.7 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 270u — making the Athlon II X2 220 the 72.1% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 220 | Athlon II X2 270u |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $32-53% | $68 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.7+112% | 15.4 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















