
Athlon II X2 220
Popular choices:

Pentium T4200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Athlon II X2 220
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $67 less on MSRP ($32 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 206.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($32 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium T4200.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,046 vs 1,055).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Pentium T4200
2009Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $32 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 220.
Athlon II X2 220
2010Pentium T4200
2009Why buy it
- ✅Costs $67 less on MSRP ($32 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 206.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.7 vs 10.7 PassMark/$ ($32 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Pentium T4200.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,046 vs 1,055).
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.7 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $32 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 220.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium T4200 better than Athlon II X2 220?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Athlon II X2 220 | Pentium T4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Athlon II X2 220 | Pentium T4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Athlon II X2 220 | Pentium T4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Athlon II X2 220 | Pentium T4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Athlon II X2 220 and Pentium T4200

Athlon II X2 220
Athlon II X2 220
The Athlon II X2 220 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,046 points. Launch price was $32.

Pentium T4200
Pentium T4200
The Pentium T4200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Athlon II X2 220 is built on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Athlon II X2 220 scores 1,046 against the Pentium T4200's 1,055 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium T4200. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 220 vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium T4200.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 220 | Pentium T4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+40% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | — |
| Process | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Regor (2009−2013) | — |
| PassMark | 1,046 | 1,055 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 285 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 500 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Athlon II X2 220 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium T4200 uses PGA478 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 220 | Pentium T4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 0 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: true (Athlon II X2 220) / not specified (Pentium T4200). Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 220 rivals Pentium E5500.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 220 | Pentium T4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | true | — |
Value Analysis
The Athlon II X2 220 launched at $32 MSRP, while the Pentium T4200 debuted at $99. On MSRP ($32 vs $99), the Athlon II X2 220 is $67 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Athlon II X2 220 delivers 32.7 pts/$ vs 10.7 pts/$ for the Pentium T4200 — making the Athlon II X2 220 the 101.7% better value option.
| Feature | Athlon II X2 220 | Pentium T4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $32-68% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | 32.7+206% | 10.7 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













