A6-9220C
VS
Athlon II X2 270u

A6-9220C vs Athlon II X2 270u

AMD

A6-9220C

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2019
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 270u

2 Cores2 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-9220C is positioned at rank 931 and the Athlon II X2 270u is on rank 897, so the Athlon II X2 270u offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-9220C

#919
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1672%
#920
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1647%
#921
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1512%
#922
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1505%
#923
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1492%
#925
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1440%
#926
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1381%
#927
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1379%
#928
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1342%
#931
A6-9220C
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#933
Athlon X2 L310
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#939
FX-7600P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
97%
#940
Athlon II M300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
97%
#944
Athlon Neo X2 L335
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
95%
#945
Core i7-3610QE
MSRP: $315|Avg: $105
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 270u

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
20281%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
19163%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13914%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4192%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3320%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2905%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1664%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1642%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1495%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1495%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1478%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1438%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1418%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1412%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1400%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
96%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
100%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
99%
#899
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
97%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
96%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
95%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
95%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#908
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
94%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
94%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
94%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
93%
#912
Pentium E6600
MSRP: $84|Avg: $50
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-9220C (2019) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-9220CAthlon II X2 270u
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon II X2 270u (2010) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-9220CAthlon II X2 270u
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-9220C and Athlon II X2 270u

AMD

A6-9220C

The A6-9220C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT4. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,053 points. Launch price was $70.

AMD

Athlon II X2 270u

The Athlon II X2 270u is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,045 points. Launch price was $68.

Processing Power

Both the A6-9220C and Athlon II X2 270u share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the A6-9220C versus 2 GHz on the Athlon II X2 270u — a 29.8% clock advantage for the A6-9220C. The A6-9220C uses the Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X2 270u uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-9220C scores 1,053 against the Athlon II X2 270u's 1,045 — a 0.8% lead for the A6-9220C.

FeatureA6-9220CAthlon II X2 270u
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+35%
2 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)
1 MB
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,053
1,045
Cinebench R23 Multi
531
Geekbench 6 Single
300
Geekbench 6 Multi
550
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-9220C uses the FT4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X2 270u uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the A6-9220C versus DDR3-1333 on the Athlon II X2 270u — the A6-9220C supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon II X2 270u supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A6-9220C) vs 2 (Athlon II X2 270u). PCIe lanes: 8 (A6-9220C) vs 16 (Athlon II X2 270u) — the Athlon II X2 270u offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD BGA soldered (A6-9220C) and AMD 760G,AMD 880G,AMD 970 (Athlon II X2 270u).

FeatureA6-9220CAthlon II X2 270u
Socket
FT4
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866+33%
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (A6-9220C) / AMD-V (Athlon II X2 270u). The A6-9220C includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon R5), while the Athlon II X2 270u requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Athlon II X2 270u targets Office/Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Athlon II X2 270u rivals Pentium E5700.

FeatureA6-9220CAthlon II X2 270u
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
AMD Radeon R5
None
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Office/Budget Desktop