Celeron N2930
VS
Pentium 3558U

Celeron N2930 vs Pentium 3558U

Intel

Celeron N2930

4 Cores4 Thrd7 WWMax: 2.16 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Pentium 3558U

2 Cores2 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2014

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron N2930 is positioned at rank 1087 and the Pentium 3558U is on rank 1123, so the Celeron N2930 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron N2930

#1075
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3044%
#1076
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2999%
#1077
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2753%
#1078
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2741%
#1079
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2716%
#1081
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2622%
#1082
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2515%
#1083
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2510%
#1084
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2443%
#1087
Celeron N2930
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1089
Core i5-3610ME
MSRP: $276|Avg: $22
100%
#1090
Core m3-7Y32
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1091
Celeron B720
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
99%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
97%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
97%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
97%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
96%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
95%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 3558U

#1111
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3522%
#1112
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3471%
#1113
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3186%
#1114
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3172%
#1115
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3143%
#1117
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3035%
#1118
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2910%
#1119
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2905%
#1120
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2827%
#1123
Pentium 3558U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1124
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
99%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
99%
#1127
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
99%
#1128
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
99%
#1129
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
98%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
98%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
97%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
93%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
93%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron N2930 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium 3558U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron N2930Pentium 3558U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron N2930Pentium 3558U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron N2930 and Pentium 3558U

Intel

Celeron N2930

The Celeron N2930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 2.16 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium 3558U

The Pentium 3558U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,041 points. Launch price was $161.

Processing Power

The Celeron N2930 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium 3558U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron N2930 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.16 GHz on the Celeron N2930 versus 1.7 GHz on the Pentium 3558U — a 23.8% clock advantage for the Celeron N2930 (base: 1.83 GHz vs 1.7 GHz). The Celeron N2930 uses the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Pentium 3558U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron N2930 scores 1,032 against the Pentium 3558U's 1,041 — a 0.9% lead for the Pentium 3558U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Celeron N2930 vs 2 MB on the Pentium 3558U.

FeatureCeleron N2930Pentium 3558U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.16 GHz+27%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
1.83 GHz+8%
1.7 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,032
1,041
Geekbench 6 Single
170
Geekbench 6 Multi
502
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron N2930 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 3558U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCeleron N2930Pentium 3558U
Socket
FCBGA1170
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
4
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Celeron N2930) / not specified (Pentium 3558U). The Celeron N2930 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Pentium 3558U requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCeleron N2930Pentium 3558U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes