Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Core 2 Duo E8300
Core 2 Duo E6750
Core 2 Duo E8300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core 2 Duo E6750 is positioned at rank 1069 and the Core 2 Duo E8300 is on rank 1060, so the Core 2 Duo E8300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6750
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Core 2 Duo E8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Core 2 Duo E8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+32%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($15) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 2 Duo E6750 and Core 2 Duo E8300
Core 2 Duo E6750
The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.
Core 2 Duo E8300
The Core 2 Duo E8300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.83 GHz, with boost up to 2.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,039 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Core 2 Duo E6750 and Core 2 Duo E8300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 versus 2.83 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8300 — a 5.8% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8300 (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.83 GHz). The Core 2 Duo E6750 uses the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Duo E6750 scores 1,029 against the Core 2 Duo E8300's 1,039 — a 1% lead for the Core 2 Duo E8300. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Core 2 Duo E8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.67 GHz | 2.83 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.66 GHz | 2.83 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB (total)+50% |
| Process | 65 nm | 45 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Conroe (2006−2007) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,029 | 1,039 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 1,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 345 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 771 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA775 socket with PCIe 1.1. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 versus DDR3-1333 on the Core 2 Duo E8300 — the Core 2 Duo E6750 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750) and P35,P45,G33,G31 (Core 2 Duo E8300).
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Core 2 Duo E8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | 1333+44333% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 | 16 GB+104857500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core 2 Duo E6750) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo E8300). Primary use case: Core 2 Duo E8300 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Core 2 Duo E8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Core 2 Duo E6750 launched at $183 MSRP, while the Core 2 Duo E8300 debuted at $163. At current prices ($15 vs $20), the Core 2 Duo E6750 is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Duo E6750 delivers 68.6 pts/$ vs 52.0 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E8300 — making the Core 2 Duo E6750 the 27.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core 2 Duo E6750 | Core 2 Duo E8300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $183 | $163-11% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-25% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.6+32% | 52.0 |
| Release Date | 2007 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core 2 Duo E6750 and Core 2 Duo E8300
