Celeron 3205U vs Core 2 Duo E6750

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3205U vs Core 2 Duo E6750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3205U vs Core 2 Duo E6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3205U

2015

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while Core 2 Duo E6750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,025 vs 1,029).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6750.

Core 2 Duo E6750

2007

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron 3205U.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $183 MSRP, while Celeron 3205U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3205U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E6750 better than Celeron 3205U?

Yes. Core 2 Duo E6750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo E6750 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E6750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo E6750 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo E6750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $183 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3205U vs Core 2 Duo E6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3205U

The Celeron 3205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,025 points. Launch price was $107.

Core 2 Duo E6750

The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3205U and Core 2 Duo E6750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 3205U versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — a 56.1% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron 3205U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3205U scores 1,025 against the Core 2 Duo E6750's 1,029 — a 0.4% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6750. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3205U vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6750.

Feature	Celeron 3205U	Core 2 Duo E6750
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.67 GHz+78%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.66 GHz+77%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+6300%	4 MB
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,025	1,029
Geekbench 6 Single	287	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	483	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3205U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 3205U versus 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — the Celeron 3205U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 3205U) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750).

Feature	Celeron 3205U	Core 2 Duo E6750
Socket	FCBGA1168	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+20%	1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 3205U) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6750). The Celeron 3205U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3205U rivals Pentium 2117U; Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.