Celeron 3205U vs V-Series V105

Celeron 3205U vs V-Series V105 Performance Spectrum

Celeron 3205U

2 / 2

1,025

0.0%

1,028

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3205U vs V-Series V105 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3205U vs V-Series V105: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3205U

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while V-Series V105 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,025 vs 1,028).

V-Series V105

2010

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3205U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is V-Series V105 better than Celeron 3205U?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron 3205U is ahead with a 1.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, V-Series V105 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, V-Series V105 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

V-Series V105 still makes the most sense overall. V-Series V105 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3205U vs V-Series V105 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3205U

The Celeron 3205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,025 points. Launch price was $107.

V-Series V105

The V-Series V105 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron 3205U packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the V-Series V105 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Celeron 3205U has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 3205U versus 1.2 GHz on the V-Series V105 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Celeron 3205U. The Celeron 3205U is built on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 3205U scores 1,025 against the V-Series V105's 1,028 — a 0.3% lead for the V-Series V105.

Feature	Celeron 3205U	V-Series V105
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz+25%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	—
PassMark	1,025	1,028
Geekbench 6 Single	287	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	483	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3205U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the V-Series V105 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 3205U	V-Series V105
Socket	FCBGA1168	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 3205U) / not specified (V-Series V105). The Celeron 3205U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the V-Series V105 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3205U rivals Pentium 2117U.