Celeron 3205U vs Pentium E6300

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3205U vs Pentium E6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3205U vs Pentium E6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3205U

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while Pentium E6300 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,025 vs 1,032).
❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.

Pentium E6300

2009

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $84 MSRP, while Celeron 3205U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3205U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium E6300 better than Celeron 3205U?

Yes. Pentium E6300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.7% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pentium E6300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E6300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium E6300 is the better buy right now. Pentium E6300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $84 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3205U vs Pentium E6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3205U

The Celeron 3205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,025 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium E6300

The Pentium E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $40.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3205U and Pentium E6300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 3205U versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E6300 — a 60.5% clock advantage for the Pentium E6300 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Celeron 3205U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium E6300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3205U scores 1,025 against the Pentium E6300's 1,032 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium E6300. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3205U vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6300.

Feature	Celeron 3205U	Pentium E6300
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.8 GHz+87%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.8 GHz+87%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+12700%	2 MB (total)
Process	14 nm-69%	45 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark	1,025	1,032
Geekbench 6 Single	287	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	483	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3205U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E6300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron 3205U	Pentium E6300
Socket	FCBGA1168	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron 3205U) / not specified (Pentium E6300). The Celeron 3205U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Pentium E6300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3205U rivals Pentium 2117U.