
Celeron 3205U

Pentium E2220
Celeron 3205U vs Pentium E2220 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron 3205U vs Pentium E2220 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron 3205U vs Pentium E2220: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron 3205U
2015Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (2 MB vs 1 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Broadwell), while Pentium E2220 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (287 vs 330).
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (483 vs 590).
- ❌687.7% higher power demand at 512W vs 65W.
Pentium E2220
2008Why buy it
- ✅+15% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 512W, a 447W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 2 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $32 MSRP, while Celeron 3205U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron 3205U can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium E2220 better than Celeron 3205U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron 3205U vs Pentium E2220 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3205U
The Celeron 3205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,025 points. Launch price was $107.

Pentium E2220
The Pentium E2220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. Base frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB L2 Cache. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Celeron 3205U is built on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron 3205U scores 1,025 against the Pentium E2220's 1,028 — a 0.3% lead for the Pentium E2220. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 287 vs 330, a 13.9% lead for the Pentium E2220 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 483 vs 590 (19.9% advantage for the Pentium E2220). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3205U vs 1 MB L2 Cache on the Pentium E2220.
| Feature | Celeron 3205U | Pentium E2220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | — |
| Boost Clock | 1.5 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz+60% |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total)+100% | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell-U (2015) | — |
| PassMark | 1,025 | 1,028 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 287 | 330+15% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 483 | 590+22% |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron 3205U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E2220 uses LGA775 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 3205U versus DDR2-800 on the Pentium E2220 — the Celeron 3205U supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 3205U supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron 3205U) vs 0 (Pentium E2220) — the Celeron 3205U offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 3205U) and G31,G41 (Pentium E2220).
| Feature | Celeron 3205U | Pentium E2220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600+100% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+300% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Pentium E2220 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron 3205U) vs None (Pentium E2220). The Celeron 3205U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Broadwell)), while the Pentium E2220 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3205U targets Budget, Pentium E2220 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron 3205U rivals Pentium 2117U.
| Feature | Celeron 3205U | Pentium E2220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Broadwell) | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | None |
| Target Use | Budget | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













