Celeron 3205U vs Celeron G1820TE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron 3205U vs Celeron G1820TE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron 3205U vs Celeron G1820TE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron 3205U

2015

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (287 vs 415).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (483 vs 629).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌848.1% higher power demand at 512W vs 54W.

Celeron G1820TE

2013

Why buy it

✅+44.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
✅Draws 54W instead of 512W, a 458W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G1820TE better than Celeron 3205U?

Yes. Celeron G1820TE is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 30.2% better Geekbench multi-core, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron G1820TE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G1820TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 30.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G1820TE still makes the most sense overall. Celeron G1820TE comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron 3205U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Celeron 3205U vs Celeron G1820TE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron 3205U

The Celeron 3205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,025 points. Launch price was $107.

Celeron G1820TE

The Celeron G1820TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,020 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Celeron 3205U and Celeron G1820TE share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Celeron 3205U versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G1820TE — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G1820TE (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Celeron 3205U uses the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G1820TE uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron 3205U scores 1,025 against the Celeron G1820TE's 1,020 — a 0.5% lead for the Celeron 3205U. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 287 vs 415, a 36.5% lead for the Celeron G1820TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 483 vs 629 (26.3% advantage for the Celeron G1820TE). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 3205U vs 3 MB (total) on the Celeron G1820TE.

Feature	Celeron 3205U	Celeron G1820TE
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.2 GHz+47%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.2 GHz+47%
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-U (2015)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,025	1,020
Geekbench 6 Single	287	415+45%
Geekbench 6 Multi	483	629+30%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron 3205U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1820TE uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 on the Celeron 3205U versus DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1820TE — the Celeron 3205U supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1820TE supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Wildcat Point-LP (Celeron 3205U) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Celeron G1820TE).

Feature	Celeron 3205U	Celeron G1820TE
Socket	FCBGA1168	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600+20%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	32 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. Both include integrated graphics — HD Graphics (Broadwell) (Celeron 3205U) and HD Graphics (Haswell) (Celeron G1820TE) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 3205U targets Budget, Celeron G1820TE targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 3205U rivals Pentium 2117U; Celeron G1820TE rivals Pentium G3220T.