Atom C3338 vs Core 2 Duo E6750

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3338 vs Core 2 Duo E6750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3338 vs Core 2 Duo E6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3338

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 9W instead of 65W, a 56W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,028 vs 1,029).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6750.

Core 2 Duo E6750

2007

Why buy it

✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Atom C3338.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $183 MSRP, while Atom C3338 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌622.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 9W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 2 Duo E6750 better than Atom C3338?

Yes. Core 2 Duo E6750 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core 2 Duo E6750 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Duo E6750 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core 2 Duo E6750 is the better buy right now. Core 2 Duo E6750 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $183 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom C3338 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom C3338 vs Core 2 Duo E6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3338

The Atom C3338 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 February 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $27.

Core 2 Duo E6750

The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Atom C3338 and Core 2 Duo E6750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3338 versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — a 19.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Atom C3338 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3338 scores 1,028 against the Core 2 Duo E6750's 1,029 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6750. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Atom C3338 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6750.

Feature	Atom C3338	Core 2 Duo E6750
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	2.67 GHz+21%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	2.66 GHz+77%
L3 Cache	4 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
Process	14 nm-78%	65 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,028	1,029

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3338 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3338 versus 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — the Atom C3338 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3338 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom C3338) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo E6750). PCIe lanes: 10 (Atom C3338) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E6750) — the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3338) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750).

Feature	Atom C3338	Core 2 Duo E6750
Socket	FCBGA1310	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866+40%	1333
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+700%	16 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	10	16+60%