Atom C3338 vs Core 2 Duo E6750
Atom C3338
Core 2 Duo E6750
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3338 is positioned at rank 543 and the Core 2 Duo E6750 is on rank 1069, so the Atom C3338 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Atom C3338
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6750
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Atom C3338 | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Atom C3338 | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3338 and Core 2 Duo E6750
Atom C3338
The Atom C3338 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 February 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $27.
Core 2 Duo E6750
The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
Both the Atom C3338 and Core 2 Duo E6750 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3338 versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — a 19.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Atom C3338 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3338 scores 1,028 against the Core 2 Duo E6750's 1,029 — a 0.1% lead for the Core 2 Duo E6750. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Atom C3338 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6750.
| Feature | Atom C3338 | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.67 GHz+21% |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.66 GHz+77% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Process | 14 nm-78% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Goldmont (2016−2017) | Conroe (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,028 | 1,029 |
Memory & Platform
The Atom C3338 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3338 versus 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — the Core 2 Duo E6750 supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3338 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom C3338) vs 2 (Core 2 Duo E6750). PCIe lanes: 10 (Atom C3338) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E6750) — the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3338) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750).
| Feature | Atom C3338 | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1310 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-1866 | 1333+33225% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+838860700% | 16 |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 10 | 16+60% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3338) / true (Core 2 Duo E6750). Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.
| Feature | Atom C3338 | Core 2 Duo E6750 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Atom C3338 and Core 2 Duo E6750
