Atom C3338 vs Pentium E6300

Intel

Atom C3338

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium E6300

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
Similar parts
·······

Atom C3338 vs Pentium E6300 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3338 vs Pentium E6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3338 vs Pentium E6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3338

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 9W instead of 65W, a 56W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (10 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,028 vs 1,032).

Pentium E6300

2009

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $84 MSRP, while Atom C3338 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 622.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 9W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Pentium E6300 better than Atom C3338?
    Yes. Pentium E6300 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Pentium E6300 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium E6300 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Pentium E6300 is the better buy right now. Pentium E6300 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $84 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Atom C3338 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2009). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Atom C3338 vs Pentium E6300 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Atom C3338

    The Atom C3338 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 February 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $27.

    Intel

    Pentium E6300

    The Pentium E6300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 May 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,032 points. Launch price was $40.

    Processing Power

    Both the Atom C3338 and Pentium E6300 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3338 versus 2.8 GHz on the Pentium E6300 — a 24% clock advantage for the Pentium E6300 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Atom C3338 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium E6300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3338 scores 1,028 against the Pentium E6300's 1,032 — a 0.4% lead for the Pentium E6300. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Atom C3338 vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6300.

    FeatureAtom C3338Pentium E6300
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 2
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.2 GHz
    2.8 GHz+27%
    Base Clock
    1.5 GHz
    2.8 GHz+87%
    L3 Cache
    4 MB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    4 MB+100%
    2 MB (total)
    Process
    14 nm-69%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Goldmont (2016−2017)
    Wolfdale (2008−2010)
    PassMark
    1,028
    1,032
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Atom C3338 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium E6300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureAtom C3338Pentium E6300
    Socket
    FCBGA1310
    LGA775
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+173%
    PCIe 1.1
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-1866
    Max RAM Capacity
    128 GB
    RAM Channels
    1
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    10