Atom C3338 vs Celeron G440

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom C3338 vs Celeron G440 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom C3338 vs Celeron G440: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom C3338

2017

Why buy it

✅+300% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1 MB).
✅Draws 9W instead of 35W, a 26W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,028 vs 1,035).
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G440 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron G440

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), while Atom C3338 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (1 MB vs 4 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $37 MSRP, while Atom C3338 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌288.9% higher power demand at 35W vs 9W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom C3338 better than Celeron G440?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Atom C3338 is ahead with 37.5% higher max boost clock. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G440 pulls ahead with 0.7% better PassMark. Atom C3338 also has the bigger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron G440 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom C3338 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Atom C3338 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $37 MSRP, and it still gives you 37.5% higher max boost clock. Celeron G440 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (28.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom C3338 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011) and 300% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 1 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom C3338 vs Celeron G440 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom C3338

The Atom C3338 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 February 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $27.

Celeron G440

The Celeron G440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $45.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom C3338 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G440 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom C3338 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3338 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron G440 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Atom C3338 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Atom C3338 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G440 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3338 scores 1,028 against the Celeron G440's 1,035 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron G440. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Atom C3338 vs 1 MB on the Celeron G440.

Feature	Atom C3338	Celeron G440
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz+38%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.5 GHz	1.6 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	256 kB
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Goldmont (2016−2017)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,028	1,035
Geekbench 6 Single	—	300

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3338 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G440 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3338 versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G440 — the Atom C3338 supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3338 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom C3338) vs 2 (Celeron G440). PCIe lanes: 10 (Atom C3338) vs 16 (Celeron G440) — the Celeron G440 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3338) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G440).

Feature	Atom C3338	Celeron G440
Socket	FCBGA1310	LGA1155
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-1866+75%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+300%	32 GB
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	10	16+60%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3338) / VT-x (Celeron G440). The Celeron G440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Atom C3338 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G440 rivals Pentium G630.