Atom C3338
VS
Celeron G440

Atom C3338 vs Celeron G440

Intel

Atom C3338

2 Cores2 Thrd9 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Celeron G440

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Atom C3338 is positioned at rank 543 and the Celeron G440 is on rank 625, so the Atom C3338 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Atom C3338

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
8086%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1527%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1356%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1048%
#332
Xeon W-2235
MSRP: $555|Avg: $350
100%
#333
Xeon Gold 5317
MSRP: $1088|Avg: $1100
98%
#334
Xeon W-2275
MSRP: $1112|Avg: $500
98%
#335
Xeon Gold 6430
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $1850
97%
#336
Xeon Gold 6421N
MSRP: $2368|Avg: $2427
97%
#543
Atom C3338
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#544
Xeon W3670
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#547
Xeon E3-1240 v2
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
99%
#548
Xeon E3-1220 v3
MSRP: $203|Avg: $89
99%
#551
Xeon W-2102
MSRP: $202|Avg: $286
98%
#553
Xeon E3-1265L v2
MSRP: $265|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G440

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11145%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10531%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7646%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2303%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1825%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1596%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
914%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
902%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
822%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
821%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
812%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
790%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
779%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
776%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
769%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
99%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
98%
#385
Celeron G4900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $85
100%
#386
Ryzen Embedded V3C18I
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
99%
#625
Celeron G440
MSRP: $37|Avg: $5
100%
#628
A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $43
99%
#629
Core i3-8350K
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
99%
#630
Core i3-6320
MSRP: $160|Avg: $35
99%
#632
Pentium G3258
MSRP: $75|Avg: $72
98%
#634
Celeron G555
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
98%
#635
Celeron G530
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
98%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
98%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
97%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
97%
#640
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom C3338 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4: 1866, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightAtom C3338Celeron G440
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron G440 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightAtom C3338Celeron G440
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Atom C3338 and Celeron G440

Intel

Atom C3338

The Atom C3338 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 22 February 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 8.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $27.

Intel

Celeron G440

The Celeron G440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 September 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $45.

Processing Power

The Atom C3338 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G440 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom C3338 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Atom C3338 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron G440 — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Atom C3338 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Atom C3338 uses the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture (14 nm), while the Celeron G440 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Atom C3338 scores 1,028 against the Celeron G440's 1,035 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron G440. L3 cache: 4 MB on the Atom C3338 vs 1 MB on the Celeron G440.

FeatureAtom C3338Celeron G440
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+38%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
1.5 GHz
1.6 GHz+7%
L3 Cache
4 MB+300%
1 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+1500%
256 kB
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Goldmont (2016−2017)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,028
1,035
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom C3338 uses the FCBGA1310 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G440 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3338 versus DDR3-1066 on the Celeron G440 — the Atom C3338 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3338 supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (Atom C3338) vs 2 (Celeron G440). PCIe lanes: 10 (Atom C3338) vs 16 (Celeron G440) — the Celeron G440 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3338) and H61,B65,H67,Z68 (Celeron G440).

FeatureAtom C3338Celeron G440
Socket
FCBGA1310
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-1866+33%
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+300%
32 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
10
16+60%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom C3338) / VT-x (Celeron G440). The Celeron G440 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Atom C3338 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G440 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureAtom C3338Celeron G440
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget