PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron J1850 vs Core 2 Duo E6750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron J1850 vs Core 2 Duo E6750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron J1850

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $101 less on MSRP ($82 MSRP vs $183 MSRP).
✅Delivers 124.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 5.6 PassMark/$ ($82 MSRP vs $183 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Core 2 Duo E6750 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6750.

Core 2 Duo E6750

2007

Why buy it

✅300% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 4) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Celeron J1850.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,029 vs 1,035).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.6 vs 12.6 PassMark/$ ($183 MSRP vs $82 MSRP).
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron J1850 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron J1850 better than Core 2 Duo E6750?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core 2 Duo E6750 is ahead with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J1850 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron J1850 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron J1850 is the better buy right now. Celeron J1850 comes in $101 cheaper on MSRP at $82 MSRP versus $183 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core 2 Duo E6750 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 124.5% better value on MSRP (12.6 vs 5.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron J1850 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron J1850 vs Core 2 Duo E6750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron J1850

The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.

Core 2 Duo E6750

The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J1850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J1850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — a 28.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron J1850 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1850 scores 1,035 against the Core 2 Duo E6750's 1,029 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron J1850. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6750.

Feature	Celeron J1850	Core 2 Duo E6750
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.67 GHz+34%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.66 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,035	1,029
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1850 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. The Core 2 Duo E6750 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J1850) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E6750) — the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1850) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750).

Feature	Celeron J1850	Core 2 Duo E6750
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J1850) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6750). The Celeron J1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900; Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.

Feature	Celeron J1850	Core 2 Duo E6750
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics (Bay Trail)	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x	true
Target Use	Low Power	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Celeron J1850 was priced at $82, while the Core 2 Duo E6750 came in at $183. On launch pricing ($82 vs $183), Celeron J1850 was $101 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron J1850 delivers 12.6 pts/$ vs 5.6 pts/$ for the Core 2 Duo E6750 — making the Celeron J1850 the 76.7% better value option.

Feature	Celeron J1850	Core 2 Duo E6750
MSRP	$82-55%	$183
Performance per Dollar	12.6+125%	5.6
Release Date	2013	2007

Search Celeron J1850 on Amazon

Search Core 2 Duo E6750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.