Celeron J1850 vs Core 2 Duo E6750

Celeron J1850

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Core 2 Duo E6750

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Celeron J1850

4 / 4

1,035

+0.6%

1,029

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1850 is positioned at rank 110 and the Core 2 Duo E6750 is on rank 1069, so the Celeron J1850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1850

#31

Ryzen 5 230

MSRP: $200|Avg: $190

98%

#98

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

283%

#99

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

279%

#100

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

256%

#101

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

255%

#102

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

253%

#104

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

244%

#105

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

234%

#106

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

234%

#107

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

228%

#110

Celeron J1850

MSRP: $82|Avg: N/A

100%

#114

Core i3-4100M

MSRP: $225|Avg: $99

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6750

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

55465%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

52409%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

38053%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

11464%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

9081%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

7944%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

4550%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

4490%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

4089%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

4088%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

4043%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

3933%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

3878%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

3863%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

3828%

#1069

Core 2 Duo E6750

MSRP: $183|Avg: $15

100%

#1070

Athlon II X4 635

MSRP: $400|Avg: $250

100%

#1071

Core i7-940

MSRP: $562|Avg: $90

96%

#1072

Celeron 2.40

MSRP: $69|Avg: $13

89%

#1073

Sempron 2800+

MSRP: $65|Avg: $29

88%

#1074

Athlon 64 3100+

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

85%

#1075

Sempron 3600+

MSRP: $105|Avg: $20

82%

#1076

Celeron 2.80

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

76%

#1077

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

MSRP: $450|Avg: $20

72%

#1078

Athlon 64 3600+

MSRP: $149|Avg: $15

71%

#1079

Core 2 Quad Q6700

MSRP: $530|Avg: $50

70%

#1080

Athlon 64 2600+

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

70%

#1081

Celeron 2.20

MSRP: $79|Avg: $15

69%

#1082

Athlon 64 X2 5200+

MSRP: $420|Avg: $15

64%

#1083

Athlon 64 X2 4000+

MSRP: $328|Avg: $10

64%

#1084

Core i7-975

MSRP: $999|Avg: $50

63%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J1850 (2013) utilizes 22 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Celeron J1850	Core 2 Duo E6750
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($82)	✅ More affordable ($15)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E6750 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Celeron J1850	Core 2 Duo E6750
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+443%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($82)	✅ More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Celeron J1850 Benchmark Check

Core 2 Duo E6750 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1850 and Core 2 Duo E6750

Celeron J1850

The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.

Core 2 Duo E6750

The Core 2 Duo E6750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,029 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron J1850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J1850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — a 28.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6750 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Celeron J1850 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1850 scores 1,035 against the Core 2 Duo E6750's 1,029 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron J1850. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6750.

Feature	Celeron J1850	Core 2 Duo E6750
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz	2.67 GHz+34%
Base Clock	2 GHz	2.66 GHz+33%
L3 Cache	2 MB L2 Cache	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-D (2013)	Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,035	1,029
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	450	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron J1850 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1850 versus 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E6750 — the Core 2 Duo E6750 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6750 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J1850) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E6750) — the Core 2 Duo E6750 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1850) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6750).

Feature	Celeron J1850	Core 2 Duo E6750
Socket	FCBGA1170	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	1333+44333%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+52428700%	16
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	4	16+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J1850) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6750). The Celeron J1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Core 2 Duo E6750 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900; Core 2 Duo E6750 rivals Phenom X3 8450.