Celeron J1850 vs Athlon X2 BE-2400
Celeron J1850
Athlon X2 BE-2400
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1850 is positioned at rank 110 and the Athlon X2 BE-2400 is on rank 855, so the Celeron J1850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1850
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 BE-2400
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron J1850 | Athlon X2 BE-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($82) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Brisbane (2007−2008) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron J1850 | Athlon X2 BE-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1564%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($82) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1850 and Athlon X2 BE-2400
Celeron J1850
The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.
Athlon X2 BE-2400
The Athlon X2 BE-2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Brisbane (2007−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,050 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Celeron J1850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J1850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 versus 2.3 GHz on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 — a 14% clock advantage for the Athlon X2 BE-2400. The Celeron J1850 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses Brisbane (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1850 scores 1,035 against the Athlon X2 BE-2400's 1,050 — a 1.4% lead for the Athlon X2 BE-2400. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache on the Celeron J1850 vs 0 kB on the Athlon X2 BE-2400.
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Athlon X2 BE-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.3 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512 kB |
| Process | 22 nm-66% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Brisbane (2007−2008) |
| PassMark | 1,035 | 1,050+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 450 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J1850 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the Celeron J1850 versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon X2 BE-2400 — the Celeron J1850 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X2 BE-2400 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J1850) vs 0 (Athlon X2 BE-2400) — the Celeron J1850 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1850) and AMD AM2 (Athlon X2 BE-2400).
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Athlon X2 BE-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x (Celeron J1850) / not specified (Athlon X2 BE-2400). The Celeron J1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1850 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900.
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Athlon X2 BE-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x | — |
| Target Use | Low Power | — |
Value Analysis
The Celeron J1850 launched at $82 MSRP, while the Athlon X2 BE-2400 debuted at $60.
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Athlon X2 BE-2400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $82 | $60-27% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $5 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2007 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron J1850 and Athlon X2 BE-2400
