Celeron J1850 vs Athlon II N350
Celeron J1850
Athlon II N350
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron J1850 is positioned at rank 110 and the Athlon II N350 is on rank 1067, so the Celeron J1850 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Celeron J1850
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II N350
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Celeron J1850 | Athlon II N350 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($82) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Bay Trail-D (2013) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Champlain (2010−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Celeron J1850 | Athlon II N350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+21%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($82) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Celeron J1850 and Athlon II N350
Celeron J1850
The Celeron J1850 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,035 points. Launch price was $82.
Athlon II N350
The Athlon II N350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,045 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Celeron J1850 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II N350 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron J1850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Celeron J1850 versus 2.4 GHz on the Athlon II N350 — a 18.2% clock advantage for the Athlon II N350. The Celeron J1850 uses the Bay Trail-D (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon II N350 uses Champlain (2010−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron J1850 scores 1,035 against the Athlon II N350's 1,045 — a 1% lead for the Athlon II N350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 210, a 15.4% lead for the Athlon II N350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 450 vs 400 (11.8% advantage for the Celeron J1850).
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Athlon II N350 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz+20% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | — |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Bay Trail-D (2013) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| PassMark | 1,035 | 1,045 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | 210+17% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 450+13% | 400 |
Memory & Platform
The Celeron J1850 uses the FCBGA1170 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II N350 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Celeron J1850) vs 0 (Athlon II N350) — the Celeron J1850 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: N/A (SoC) (Celeron J1850) and RS880M,SB850 (Athlon II N350).
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Athlon II N350 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1170 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 4 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Celeron J1850) vs AMD-V (Athlon II N350). The Celeron J1850 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Athlon II N350 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J1850 targets Low Power, Athlon II N350 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron J1850 rivals Pentium J2900; Athlon II N350 rivals Pentium P6100.
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Athlon II N350 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | HD Graphics (Bay Trail) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Low Power | Legacy Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Celeron J1850 launched at $82 MSRP, while the Athlon II N350 debuted at $100.
| Feature | Celeron J1850 | Athlon II N350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $82-18% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Release Date | 2013 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Celeron J1850 and Athlon II N350
