Core i3-370M
VS
Core 2 Duo E4500

Core i3-370M vs Core 2 Duo E4500

Intel

Core i3-370M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E4500

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-370M is positioned at rank 570 and the Core 2 Duo E4500 is on rank 1017, so the Core i3-370M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-370M

#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
99%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
98%
#558
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
752%
#559
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
741%
#560
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
681%
#561
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
677%
#562
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
671%
#564
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
648%
#565
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
622%
#566
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
621%
#567
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
604%
#570
Core i3-370M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#572
A10-9600P
MSRP: $128|Avg: $50
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E4500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
35584%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
33623%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
24413%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7355%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5826%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5096%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2919%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2881%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2623%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2623%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2593%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2524%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2488%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2478%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2456%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
100%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
99%
#1020
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
99%
#1021
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
99%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
98%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
96%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
96%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
95%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
92%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
92%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
92%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
91%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
91%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-370M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo E4500 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i3-370MCore 2 Duo E4500
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-370MCore 2 Duo E4500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-370M and Core 2 Duo E4500

Intel

Core i3-370M

The Core i3-370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,170 points. Launch price was $245.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E4500

The Core 2 Duo E4500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,165 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i3-370M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo E4500's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-370M versus 2.2 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E4500 — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-370M (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i3-370M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E4500 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-370M scores 1,170 against the Core 2 Duo E4500's 1,165 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-370M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-370M vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E4500.

FeatureCore i3-370MCore 2 Duo E4500
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+9%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+9%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB+700%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
1,170
1,165
Geekbench 6 Single
315
Geekbench 6 Multi
700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-370M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E4500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core i3-370M versus 800 on the Core 2 Duo E4500 — the Core 2 Duo E4500 supports 198.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E4500 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55 (Core i3-370M) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E4500).

FeatureCore i3-370MCore 2 Duo E4500
Socket
PGA988
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
800+26567%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+52428700%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-370M) vs false (Core 2 Duo E4500). The Core i3-370M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo E4500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-370M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-370M rivals AMD Athlon II P320; Core 2 Duo E4500 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4600+.

FeatureCore i3-370MCore 2 Duo E4500
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
false
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop