Core i3-370M
VS
Core 2 Duo E8400

Core i3-370M vs Core 2 Duo E8400

Intel

Core i3-370M

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E8400

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i3-370M is positioned at rank 570 and the Core 2 Duo E8400 is on rank 508, so the Core 2 Duo E8400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-370M

#178
Core i7-1360P
MSRP: $480|Avg: $280
99%
#179
Core i7-1260P
MSRP: $432|Avg: $432
98%
#558
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
752%
#559
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
741%
#560
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
681%
#561
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
677%
#562
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
671%
#564
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
648%
#565
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
622%
#566
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
621%
#567
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
604%
#570
Core i3-370M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#572
A10-9600P
MSRP: $128|Avg: $50
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E8400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8028%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7585%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5508%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1659%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1314%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1150%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
659%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
650%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
592%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
592%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
585%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
569%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
561%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
559%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
554%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
97%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
99%
#508
Core 2 Duo E8400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#511
Athlon X4 880K
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
99%
#515
Athlon X4 870K
MSRP: $90|Avg: $35
99%
#518
Pentium G2030T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
98%
#519
Athlon X4 730
MSRP: $60|Avg: $52
98%
#520
Core i3-7101E
MSRP: $117|Avg: $50
98%
#522
Athlon II X4 740
MSRP: $71|Avg: $20
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo E8400 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-370M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i3-370MCore 2 Duo E8400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i3-370MCore 2 Duo E8400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i3-370M and Core 2 Duo E8400

Intel

Core i3-370M

The Core i3-370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,170 points. Launch price was $245.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E8400

The Core 2 Duo E8400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 6 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,165 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i3-370M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo E8400's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-370M versus 3 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E8400 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E8400 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i3-370M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E8400 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-370M scores 1,170 against the Core 2 Duo E8400's 1,165 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-370M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i3-370M vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E8400.

FeatureCore i3-370MCore 2 Duo E8400
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz
3 GHz+25%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
6 MB (total)+2300%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,170
1,165
Geekbench 6 Single
315
Geekbench 6 Multi
700
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-370M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E8400 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1066 on the Core i3-370M versus 1333 on the Core 2 Duo E8400 — the Core 2 Duo E8400 supports 199.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E8400 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM55 (Core i3-370M) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E8400).

FeatureCore i3-370MCore 2 Duo E8400
Socket
PGA988
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
1333+44333%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+52428700%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-370M) vs true (Core 2 Duo E8400). The Core i3-370M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Core 2 Duo E8400 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-370M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-370M rivals AMD Athlon II P320; Core 2 Duo E8400 rivals Phenom II X2 550.

FeatureCore i3-370MCore 2 Duo E8400
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
true
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop