Core i3-370M vs Sempron 3850

Core i3-370M vs Sempron 3850 Performance Spectrum

Core i3-370M

2 / 4

1,170

+0.2%

1,168

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-370M vs Sempron 3850 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-370M vs Sempron 3850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-370M

2010

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Sempron 3850 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1948% higher power demand at 512W vs 25W.

Sempron 3850

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 25W instead of 512W, a 487W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,168 vs 1,170).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-370M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-370M better than Sempron 3850?

Yes. Core i3-370M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i3-370M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-370M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-370M still makes the most sense overall. Core i3-370M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron 3850 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i3-370M vs Sempron 3850 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-370M

The Core i3-370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,170 points. Launch price was $245.

Sempron 3850

The Sempron 3850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,168 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-370M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Sempron 3850 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Sempron 3850 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-370M versus 1.3 GHz on the Sempron 3850 — a 59.5% clock advantage for the Core i3-370M. The Core i3-370M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Sempron 3850 uses Kabini (2013−2014) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-370M scores 1,170 against the Sempron 3850's 1,168 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i3-370M.

Feature	Core i3-370M	Sempron 3850
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+85%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2048 kB+700%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Arrandale (2010−2011)	Kabini (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,170	1,168
Geekbench 6 Single	315	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	700	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-370M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3850 uses AM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i3-370M	Sempron 3850
Socket	PGA988	AM1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1066	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-370M) / not specified (Sempron 3850). The Core i3-370M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Sempron 3850 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-370M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-370M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.