Celeron M 723 vs Core i3-370M

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 723 vs Core i3-370M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 723 vs Core i3-370M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 723

2008

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (100 vs 700).
❌Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while Core i3-370M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-370M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i3-370M

2010

Why buy it

✅+600% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics, while Celeron M 723 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Celeron M 723 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron M 723 better than Core i3-370M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron M 723 is ahead with a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-370M pulls ahead with 600% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-370M is the stronger fit. You are getting 600% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron M 723 is the better buy right now. Celeron M 723 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $161 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i3-370M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 600% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-370M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2010 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M 723 vs Core i3-370M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

Core i3-370M

The Core i3-370M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,170 points. Launch price was $245.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 723 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i3-370M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i3-370M has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 versus 2.4 GHz on the Core i3-370M — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i3-370M. The Celeron M 723 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i3-370M uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 723 scores 1,180 against the Core i3-370M's 1,170 — a 0.9% lead for the Celeron M 723. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 100 vs 315, a 103.6% lead for the Core i3-370M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 100 vs 700 (150% advantage for the Core i3-370M).

Feature	Celeron M 723	Core i3-370M
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	2.4 GHz+100%
Base Clock	—	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB	256K (per core)+25500%
Process	45 nm	32 nm-29%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	1,180	1,170
Geekbench 6 Single	100	315+215%
Geekbench 6 Multi	100	700+600%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 723 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i3-370M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron M 723 versus DDR3-1066 on the Core i3-370M — the Core i3-370M supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 723) vs 16 (Core i3-370M) — the Core i3-370M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GS45 (Celeron M 723) and HM55 (Core i3-370M).

Feature	Celeron M 723	Core i3-370M
Socket	BGA956	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	DDR3-1066+33%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Celeron M 723) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-370M). The Core i3-370M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Celeron M 723 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded, Core i3-370M targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100; Core i3-370M rivals AMD Athlon II P320.