Celeron M 723 vs Celeron N2830

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron M 723 vs Celeron N2830 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron M 723 vs Celeron N2830: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron M 723

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 7W, a 6W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,180 vs 1,185).
❌Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while Celeron N2830 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron N2830 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Celeron N2830

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Celeron M 723 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌600% higher power demand at 7W vs 1W.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron N2830 better than Celeron M 723?

Yes. Celeron N2830 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Celeron N2830 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Celeron N2830 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron N2830 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Celeron N2830 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $161 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M 723 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.4% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron N2830 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron M 723 vs Celeron N2830 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron N2830

The Celeron N2830 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 February 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.16 GHz, with boost up to 2.41 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1170. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $107.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron M 723 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Celeron N2830 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Celeron N2830 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 versus 2.41 GHz on the Celeron N2830 — a 67% clock advantage for the Celeron N2830. The Celeron M 723 uses the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron N2830 uses Bay Trail-M (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron M 723 scores 1,180 against the Celeron N2830's 1,185 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron N2830.

Feature	Celeron M 723	Celeron N2830
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	2 / 2+100%
Boost Clock	1.2 GHz	2.41 GHz+101%
Base Clock	—	2.16 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	45 nm	22 nm-51%
Architecture	Penryn (2008−2011)	Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,180	1,185
Geekbench 6 Single	100	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron M 723 uses the BGA956 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Celeron N2830 uses FCBGA1170 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Celeron M 723 versus 1333 on the Celeron N2830 — the Celeron N2830 supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Celeron M 723) vs 4 (Celeron N2830) — the Celeron N2830 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: GS45 (Celeron M 723) and FCBGA1170 (Celeron N2830).

Feature	Celeron M 723	Celeron N2830
Socket	BGA956	FCBGA1170
PCIe Generation	PCIe 1.1	PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed	DDR2-800	1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: None (Celeron M 723) vs true (Celeron N2830). The Celeron N2830 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Celeron M 723 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100; Celeron N2830 rivals AMD A6-6310.