Atom Z3770 vs Celeron M 723

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom Z3770 vs Celeron M 723 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom Z3770 vs Celeron M 723: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom Z3770

2013

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), while Celeron M 723 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌700% higher power demand at 8W vs 1W.

Celeron M 723

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 8W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,180 vs 1,189).
❌Launch MSRP is still $161 MSRP, while Atom Z3770 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Atom Z3770 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z3770 better than Celeron M 723?

Yes. Atom Z3770 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom Z3770 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.3% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z3770 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z3770 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Atom Z3770 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $161 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron M 723 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 0.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom Z3770 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Atom Z3770 vs Celeron M 723 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom Z3770

The Atom Z3770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 2.39 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,189 points. Launch price was $37.

Celeron M 723

The Celeron M 723 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: BGA956. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,180 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom Z3770 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron M 723 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Atom Z3770 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.39 GHz on the Atom Z3770 versus 1.2 GHz on the Celeron M 723 — a 66.3% clock advantage for the Atom Z3770. The Atom Z3770 uses the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron M 723 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Atom Z3770 scores 1,189 against the Celeron M 723's 1,180 — a 0.8% lead for the Atom Z3770.

Feature	Atom Z3770	Celeron M 723
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+300%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	2.39 GHz+99%	1.2 GHz
Base Clock	1.46 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)	Penryn (2008−2011)
PassMark	1,189	1,180
Geekbench 6 Single	—	100
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom Z3770 uses the UTFCBGA1380 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron M 723 uses BGA956 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1066 on the Atom Z3770 versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron M 723 — the Atom Z3770 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron M 723 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 0 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom Z3770) and GS45 (Celeron M 723).

Feature	Atom Z3770	Celeron M 723
Socket	UTFCBGA1380	BGA956
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0+82%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1066+33%	DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity	4 GB	8 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	0	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Atom Z3770) / None (Celeron M 723). The Atom Z3770 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail)), while the Celeron M 723 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron M 723 targets Legacy Embedded. Direct competitor: Celeron M 723 rivals Core Solo U2100.