Atom x5-E3930 vs Atom Z3770

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Atom Z3770 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Atom Z3770: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Atom x5-E3930

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 7W instead of 8W, a 2W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (4 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,185 vs 1,189).

Atom Z3770

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌23.1% higher power demand at 8W vs 6.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Atom Z3770 better than Atom x5-E3930?

Yes. Atom Z3770 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Atom Z3770 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Atom Z3770 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Atom Z3770 still makes the most sense overall. Atom Z3770 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Atom x5-E3930 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Atom x5-E3930 vs Atom Z3770 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Atom x5-E3930

The Atom x5-E3930 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 7 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,185 points. Launch price was $69.

Atom Z3770

The Atom Z3770 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.46 GHz, with boost up to 2.39 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: UTFCBGA1380. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,189 points. Launch price was $37.

⚡

Processing Power

The Atom x5-E3930 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Atom Z3770 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom Z3770 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Atom x5-E3930 versus 2.39 GHz on the Atom Z3770 — a 28.2% clock advantage for the Atom Z3770 (base: 1.3 GHz vs 1.46 GHz). The Atom x5-E3930 uses the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Atom Z3770 uses Bay Trail-T (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Atom x5-E3930 scores 1,185 against the Atom Z3770's 1,189 — a 0.3% lead for the Atom Z3770. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Atom x5-E3930	Atom Z3770
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	2.39 GHz+33%
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	1.46 GHz+12%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	512K (per core)+25500%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Apollo Lake (2014−2016)	Bay Trail-T (2013−2014)
PassMark	1,185	1,189

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Atom x5-E3930 uses the FCBGA1296 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom Z3770 uses UTFCBGA1380 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1866 on the Atom x5-E3930 versus LPDDR3-1066 on the Atom Z3770 — the Atom x5-E3930 supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom x5-E3930 supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 4 (Atom x5-E3930) vs 0 (Atom Z3770) — the Atom x5-E3930 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel FCBGA1296 (Atom x5-E3930) and Intel FC-UTBGA592 (Atom Z3770).

Feature	Atom x5-E3930	Atom Z3770
Socket	FCBGA1296	UTFCBGA1380
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1866+75%	LPDDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB+100%	4 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	4	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 500 (Atom x5-E3930) and Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (Atom Z3770) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.